I applied to the registry official at Moabit Prison (JVA Moabit)
On 02.05.2025 at 6:20, I applied to the registry official at Moabit Prison (JVA Moabit) for an urgent appointment with a registry official to lodge a criminal complaint under § 206 StGB against Moabit Prison (Justizvollzugsanstalt Moabit) (see point 53). The application was ignored — a further serious violation of my right.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
IMPORTANT:
The existing obstacles to submitting my supplements to the grounds of appeal on points of lawThe grounds for the appeal on points of law (Revision) against the judgment of 22.07.2024, submitted by court-appointed defence counsel on 28.11.2024. were brought to the attention of the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) through Annexes 16_F2, 24_F2, 30_F2 and 32_F2.
My supplements to the grounds of appeal on points of lawThe grounds for the appeal on points of law (Revision) against the judgment of 22.07.2024, submitted by court-appointed defence counsel on 28.11.2024. with an original signature and an express application for acceptance were transmitted to the BGH as part of those annexes (in particular 24_F2 and 32_F2).
In all letters to the BGH, I pointed out that I was not represented by defence counsel. My application of 17.12.2024 for release of court-appointed defence counsel from duties has not been decided to this day. Nor have I been granted access to the case file so far.
I attached declarations in lieu of oath (eidesstattliche Erklärungen) to all applications to substantiate the circumstances described.
Despite demonstrable postal deliveries, I have never received an acknowledgement of receipt under § 37 StPO from the Federal Court of Justice — not a single letter from Leipzig has been served on me so far.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Commentary — assessment by Dmitry Bagrash
The application concerned a criminal complaint under § 206 StGB against the prison in whose custody I was held — and was submitted through that same prison because no other route was open to me. It went unanswered. As long as the institution against which a complaint is directed also controls access to the body with which it should be lodged, effective legal protection is, in my view, structurally excluded.
Document source
Note: No separate Drive document is stored for this event. Annexes 16_F2, 24_F2, 30_F2 and 32_F2 mentioned in the text concern earlier supplements to the grounds of appeal on points of law to the BGH and will be documented separately when the corresponding chronology numbers, which have not yet been processed, are reached.