Receipt of opened letters
On 31.03.2025 at 11:55, I received three letters that had already been opened: one from the Federal Constitutional Court, one from the European Court of Human Rights and one from my son. I have serious doubts about whether the content of the court letters is complete, since documents relevant to the appeal on points of law are missing from letters from my son and correspondence from acquaintances, including a complaint of a violation of the right to be heard (Anhörungsrüge). I have also established that my own letters apparently no longer reach their recipients, which suggests that my mail is being systematically intercepted or tampered with. Despite these difficulties, I nevertheless managed to send several documents bearing my signature to the court and other institutions through staff members I know and through private arrangements. The question remains, however, why I am forced to use such unconventional channels to send and receive lawful letters. This situation is not only distressing and intolerable, but also unlawful.
Commentary — Dmitry Bagrash’s assessment
Mail from the Federal Constitutional Court and the European Court of Human Rights is not subject to inspection by the facility; it is privileged under § 29 Abs. 2 StVollzG and Art. 8 EMRK respectively. The fact that these very letters arrived opened is therefore not a formal error, but the core of the allegation. Naturally, no substitute evidence of the original content exists — which is why I record every individual incident with its date.
Source of the document
Note: No separate Drive document is provided for this event; it is a statement of fact by the complainant.