Access to court 29.04.2025

Receipt of a letter in a replaced envelope

On 29.04.2025 at 12:15, I received a letter from the Senate Department for Justice for the first time, in an apparently sealed envelope. Observation: The outer surface of the envelope was blank — without postage or a postmark. Explanatory hypothesis: An envelope without postage or a postmark cannot have travelled through the regular postal system in this condition; the natural inference is that the original envelope was replaced. Gap in the evidence: Who replaced the envelope, for what reason and with what intent, I cannot establish from the envelope alone; I therefore make no finding under criminal law pursuant to § 206 StGB — that is a matter for the investigating authorities. The letter contained only the return of my complaint against the Berlin Regional Court (Landgericht Berlin) and Tiergarten Local Court (Amtsgericht Tiergarten) addressed to the Senate Department for Justice.

Commentary — assessment by Dmitry Bagrash

An envelope without postage or a postmark cannot have travelled through the postal system. This is the objective part of this entry, independent of my perception. The same finding recurs on 08.10.2025 (Chronology No. 121), when a court letter arrived without the expressly announced annexes in just such an envelope.

Document source

Note: No separate Drive document is stored for this event; the criminal complaint arising from this incident is documented under F2-055 and F2-059.