Final escalation because the submission of my appeal on points of law could not be verified. On 30.03.2026 I initiated a final escalation stage after receiving no substantiated and verifiable response to my letters of 02.03.2026, because my appeal on points of law (Rechtsbeschwerde) against the LG Berlin I (Berlin Regional Court I) order of 10.12.2025, lodged on 13.01.2026 by having it recorded at AG Zossen (Zossen Local Court), case reference 599 StVK 215/25 Vollz, was still not evidenced by a Kammergericht (Berlin Higher Regional Court) case reference, nor had its proper submission or forwarding been demonstrated to me. I therefore set a final time limit of 72 hours for each of the Landgericht Berlin I, the Kammergericht, the President of the Landgericht Berlin I, the President of the Kammergericht and the Senatsverwaltung für Justiz und Verbraucherschutz (Senate Department for Justice and Consumer Protection), and announced that if a reliable response continued to be absent, I would seek urgent constitutional judicial protection and use international complaint mechanisms.

Berlin, 30.03.2026 — To the Kammergericht, Elßholzstraße 30-33, 10781 Berlin (fax: 030 9015-2200). Subject: Renewed precautionary submission, request for the case file and final time limit.

I am again contacting the Kammergericht as a precaution in its capacity as the court hearing appeals on points of law. In my letter of 02.03.2026 I had already informed the Kammergericht, as a precaution, of the impending gap in judicial protection; no response has been given to date. As I have received neither confirmation of receipt nor a case reference, there is a serious suspicion that my appeal on points of law has not yet been submitted to the competent court.

I request, within 72 hours: 1. information on whether the matter is pending and what case reference has been assigned; 2. if not, that the file be called for immediately from the Landgericht Berlin I; 3. in the alternative, that the enclosed copies be added to the file as renewed precautionary submissions; 4. written confirmation to me of receipt and the measures taken.

In view of the documented history, the suspicion arises that the obstruction of judicial protection is not merely due to an individual oversight but is institutionally shielded or at least tolerated.

Yours faithfully, Dmitry Bagrash

Berlin, 30.03.2026 — To the President of the Landgericht Berlin I, Turmstraße 91, 10559 Berlin (fax: 030 9014-2010). Subject: Escalation under supervision of official conduct because of suspected continuing obstruction of judicial protection.

I hereby lodge a complaint concerning official conduct (Dienstaufsichtsbeschwerde). Its subject is not the judicial decision on the merits as such but the handling of my appeal on points of law in terms of judicial administration. Despite my letter of 02.03.2026, to date I have neither confirmation of receipt nor evidence of submission to the Kammergericht.

I request written information within 72 hours on: 1. which registry was or is responsible; 2. when the appeal on points of law was received; 3. whether, when and to whom the matter was submitted to the Kammergericht; 4. what internal judicial administrative measures are being taken; 5. under what reference number the supervision of official conduct matter is being processed.

I expressly point out that this is not about improper influence on a judicial decision but about the handling of incoming submissions, file management, forwarding, verifiability and a substantive response.

Yours faithfully, Dmitry Bagrash

Berlin, 30.03.2026 — To the President of the Kammergericht, Elßholzstraße 30-33, 10781 Berlin (fax: 030 9015-2200). Subject: Information under supervision of official conduct and request to secure effective judicial protection.

I inform you under supervision of official conduct about a matter which, in my assessment, is capable of creating a substantial gap in judicial protection. To date I have received neither reliable evidence of submission from the Landgericht Berlin I nor confirmation of receipt or a case reference from the Kammergericht.

I request written information within 72 hours on: 1. whether the Kammergericht has already received the matter; 2. what steps have been initiated to call for the file; 3. whether, from the perspective of supervision of official conduct, there is reason to clarify the events at the Landgericht Berlin I.

Please understand that I expressly document this letter as the final domestic step to safeguard protection. If this attempt is also unsuccessful, I will contact the Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court) and use international complaint mechanisms.

Yours faithfully, Dmitry Bagrash

Berlin, 30.03.2026 — To the Senatsverwaltung für Justiz und Verbraucherschutz, Salzburger Straße 21-25, 10825 Berlin (fax: 030 9013-2000). Subject: Final demand under administrative oversight before constitutional and international steps — suspicion of institutionally tolerated obstruction of judicial protection.

Since 2025 I have repeatedly documented obstacles to access to justice, particularly refusals or delays in recording submissions, a lack of written substantive responses and confirmations of receipt, and failures to forward or misdirection of legal remedies subject to time limits. In my view, these events taken together give rise to a serious suspicion that the continuing obstruction of judicial protection is not merely due to individual failures but is institutionally shielded or at least tolerated.

I demand that the Senate Department state within 72 hours: 1. what administrative oversight measures are being taken; 2. whether the Senate Department was already involved in the matter; 3. what case reference is being assigned; 4. which body is responsible for a prompt response.

This letter is the final domestic step through which I still demonstrably demand that effective judicial protection be ensured within Germany. If no substantiated response follows, I will seek urgent constitutional judicial protection and use international individual and complaint mechanisms.

Yours faithfully, Dmitry Bagrash