⚖ Urgent: criminal defence lawyer sought — outside Berlin

Political prisoner, application lodged with the European Court of Human Rights (EGMR), threat of deportation. Unprecedented resistance from the Berlin prosecution service is to be expected. The lawyer must be based outside Berlin.

Details →
Case 2 · 30.03.2026 · To the President of LG Berlin I (Berlin Regional Court I) · 599 StVK 215/25 Vollz

Annex 103_F2 — escalation within supervision of official duties on suspicion of continuing obstruction of legal protection

Complaint concerning supervision of the performance of official duties (Dienstaufsichtsbeschwerde) to the judicial administration of Landgericht Berlin I (Berlin Regional Court I). The submission itself draws the distinction: its subject is expressly not the judge’s decision on the merits, but judicial administration — handling incoming material, maintaining the file, forwarding, traceability and responses.

Five questions, a 72-hour time limit: which registry was responsible; when the Regional Court actually received the appeal on points of law (Rechtsbeschwerde); whether, when and to whom it was submitted at the Kammergericht (Berlin Higher Regional Court); what internal clarification measures are being taken; under which file reference the review concerning supervision of official duties is being conducted.

If these questions also remain unanswered, the letter states, I will have to regard that as a further significant indication that effective domestic legal protection is no longer actually available.
Four letters in one day — four levels. On 30.03.2026, I brought the same matter before four bodies at once: 102_F2 to the Kammergericht as the court deciding appeals on points of law (Rechtsbeschwerde), 103_F2 to the President of Landgericht Berlin I, 104_F2 to the President of the Kammergericht and 105_F2 to the Senate Department for Justice and Consumer Protection (Senatsverwaltung für Justiz und Verbraucherschutz). Each set a time limit of 72 hours. The subject is always the same: the appeal on points of law (Rechtsbeschwerde) lodged on the record at Amtsgericht Zossen (Zossen Local Court; case reference 131 AR 1/26) on 13.01.2026 against the order of LG Berlin I of 10.12.2025 in case 599 StVK 215/25 Vollz — and the absence of proof that it was submitted to the Kammergericht at all.

Copies of all four were also sent to the Berlin House of Representatives (Abgeordnetenhaus von Berlin) — to its President (fax 030 2325-1048), the Petitions Committee (030 2325-1478) and the Committee on Constitutional and Legal Affairs (030 2325-1318). The matter has therefore been before parliament since March 2026.

Correction of 02.09.2026: The fax number given here for the President of the House of Representatives — (030) 2325-1048 — is incorrect. The correct number is (030) 2325 1008. Transmissions to 1048 failed on 31.03.2026, 01.09.2026 and 02.09.2026; only the transmission to 1008 on 02.09.2026 at 18:29 succeeded. Receipt by the President of the letters of 30.03.2026 is therefore not established. This does not apply to the Petitions Committee (2325 1478) or the Committee on Constitutional and Legal Affairs (2325 1318) — their fax lines demonstrably work.
Context. The matter recurs five months later in a different form: in August 2026, following confirmed delivery on 19.08.2026, the draft of the next appeal on points of law (Rechtsbeschwerde) remained in the prison for five days without being handed to me (Annex 174_F2). I do not claim a connection — I note that in both cases a legal remedy subject to a time limit became stuck in the administrative process, and in both cases only my own escalation brought movement.
The signed original can be viewed in full above. This page summarises it and does not replace it.