Political prisoner, ECtHR complaint filed, threat of deportation. Unprecedented resistance from the Berlin prosecution service is to be expected. The lawyer must be based outside Berlin.
Details →Senate Department answers the question about the video-call ban by referring to Google — the order of 11.09.2026 remains unmentioned
By letter of 14.09.2026, reference III A 2 - 4510-0027/2026/E, handled by Ms Hehmann, the Senate Department for Justice and Consumer Protection (Senatsverwaltung für Justiz und Verbraucherschutz) provides a combined reply to six of my submissions from 23.08. to 10.09.2026 — grouped together “for reasons of economy”, as the letter puts it.
These include the two requests I transmitted by fax on 02.09.2026: clarification of how JVA Heidering (Heidering Prison) learned of the video in question five days before my video calls were banned, and information under § 147 GVG about the status of my criminal complaint against Senior Public Prosecutor Klaus-Michael Wachs. The first question is answered verbatim: “Since you make your activities and also the video you have named publicly accessible on the internet, I see no reason to ask Justizvollzugsanstalt Heidering to provide me with information about how it learned of them. Anyone who googles you can acquire this information within a very short time.” The second: “forwarded to the competent specialist division; I am awaiting a response from it”. A further matter is regarded as “closed” solely on the basis of information provided by JVA Heidering itself to the Petitions Committee on 09.09.2026.
I received the letter on 22.09.2026.
What the reply addresses — and what it does not mention
On 11.09.2026, three days before this letter was drafted, the Berlin Regional Court I (Landgericht Berlin I) had already set aside JVA Heidering’s video-call ban decision as unlawful (Chronology No. 203, Annex 218_F2) — precisely the matter whose preceding circumstances I had asked to have clarified. The reply does not mention that order anywhere. I do not allege deliberate omission: according to the table printed in the letter, the internal referral to the responsible specialist officer is dated the same day, 14.09.2026, and I do not know whether the order was already in the Senate Department’s file at that time. It remains striking that the part of the reply based on information from the prison itself also relies on the position as of 09.09.2026 — two days before the judicial finding of unlawfulness.
Source of the document
Annex 220_F2 — Senate Department reply, 2 pages, certified, photographed and prepared.
220_F2 → · Transmission evidence for the two requests 199_F2 → · Order concerning the video-call ban 218_F2 → · Dossier on Ms Hehmann → · Dossier on Dr. Badenberg →