⚖ Urgent: criminal defence lawyer sought — outside Berlin
Political prisoner, application lodged with the European Court of Human Rights (EGMR), threat of deportation. Unprecedented resistance from the Berlin prosecution service is to be expected. The lawyer must be based outside Berlin.
Details →Case 2 · Landgericht Berlin I (Berlin Regional Court I), 95th chamber for matters concerning execution of sentences (Strafvollstreckungskammer) · order of 11.09.2026, received 17.09.2026
Annex 218_F2 — order 595 StVK 126/26 Vollz: decision imposing a video-call ban set aside
Operative part: 1. The decision of Justizvollzugsanstalt Heidering (Heidering correctional facility) of 22.07.2026 is set aside. 2. The remainder of the application is dismissed. 3. The respondent bears 9/10 of the costs of the proceedings and the applicant 1/10. 4. The value of the dispute is fixed at 500 EUR. — Landgericht Berlin I (Berlin Regional Court I), 95th chamber for matters concerning execution of sentences (Strafvollstreckungskammer), single judge Netsch-Hohloch, 11.09.2026.
Context. Challenged decision and the email that triggered it: Annex 152_F2 · Statement of the prison of 25.08.2026: 205_F2, 206_F2 · Full contextual account: Dossier “The video-call ban” · Dossier MTAL Lohmeier.
Source of information: original document in the document archive (certified copy, 10 pages: covering letter, order, reasons, information on remedies). This page places the document in context and does not reproduce it in full.