⚖ Urgent: criminal defence lawyer sought — outside Berlin
Political prisoner, application lodged with the European Court of Human Rights (EGMR), threat of deportation. Unprecedented resistance from the Berlin prosecution service is to be expected. The lawyer must be based outside Berlin.
Details →Case 2 · Declaration in lieu of oath (Eidesstattliche Erklärung) · 17.07.2026
Annex 146_F2 — declaration in lieu of oath (Eidesstattliche Erklärung) concerning the video call ban, implemented without a written decision
My declaration in lieu of oath (eidesstattliche Erklärung) under § 156 StGB, made on the day of the ban. I was given an opportunity to comment; I stated that I had breached no statutory provision and insisted on receiving a written, challengeable decision. I further stated that I would resume my video addresses after the ban was lifted and continue to publish all documents naming their authors.
Not a word was said in the conversation about the substance of my video address — that is, the allegations it made against the responsible judge and the Berlin justice system.
After my return to the cell, access to video calls had in fact been blocked. No legal basis was given to me, and no decision open to challenge was handed over.
Not a word was said in the conversation about the substance of my video address — that is, the allegations it made against the responsible judge and the Berlin justice system.
After my return to the cell, access to video calls had in fact been blocked. No legal basis was given to me, and no decision open to challenge was handed over.
Position in the chain. The written decision followed only five days later, on 22.07.2026: Annex 152_F2. It confirms the sanction retrospectively.
Source of the information: the chronology of case 2 maintained by Dmitry Bagrash. This page summarises the material content and does not reproduce the document in full; the original is linked. Assessments are identified as such and do not replace a judicial finding.