⚖ Urgent: criminal defence lawyer sought — outside Berlin

Political prisoner, application lodged with the ECtHR, threatened with deportation. Unprecedented resistance from the Berlin prosecution service is expected. The lawyer must be based outside Berlin.

Details →
Case 2 · Berlin Prosecutor General’s Office (Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Berlin) · 26.05.2026

Annex 148_F2 — Statement of the Prosecutor General’s Office (Generalstaatsanwaltschaft) — verbatim copying

Signed by the group leader at the Berlin Prosecutor General’s Office (Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Berlin), Lazarenko. The principal sentence states that the convicted person is driven by intense anger, a pronounced sense of grievance and a clearly expressed urge for retaliation.

This sentence already appears almost word for word in the diagnostic assessment of Moabit prison (JVA Moabit) of 17.04.2026 — that is, five weeks earlier and from a different body. What is established is therefore the copying of wording. Whether the Prosecutor General’s Office independently examined the files, I cannot determine from outside; I do not know this authority’s internal processes.

I received the page containing this sentence only on 14.07.2026 — twenty days after the decision of 24.06.2026 against which I should have been able to use it to defend myself. It was precisely the second page missing from the version previously sent (Annex 132_F2): there, the first page of the reasons was followed immediately by the final page.

And on the same page the Prosecutor General’s Office itself acknowledges that a full admission of guilt is not an indispensable requirement and denial of the offence alone cannot support a negative social prognosis. Nevertheless, it is precisely the failure to acknowledge the offence that is used against my release.
Position in the chain. Source of the wording: Annex 137_F2 · The full chain: The missing link
Note: this page summarises the content relevant to the prognosis and does not reproduce the document in full. The original is linked. Assessments are identified as such and do not replace a judicial finding.