⚖ Urgent: criminal defence lawyer sought — outside Berlin
Political prisoner, application lodged with the ECtHR, threatened with deportation. Unprecedented resistance from the Berlin prosecution service is expected. The lawyer must be based outside Berlin.
Details →Case 2 · Berlin Prosecutor General’s Office (Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Berlin) · 26.05.2026
Annex 148_F2 — Statement of the Prosecutor General’s Office (Generalstaatsanwaltschaft) — verbatim copying
Signed by the group leader at the Berlin Prosecutor General’s Office (Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Berlin), Lazarenko. The principal sentence states that the convicted person is driven by intense anger, a pronounced sense of grievance and a clearly expressed urge for retaliation.
This sentence already appears almost word for word in the diagnostic assessment of Moabit prison (JVA Moabit) of 17.04.2026 — that is, five weeks earlier and from a different body. What is established is therefore the copying of wording. Whether the Prosecutor General’s Office independently examined the files, I cannot determine from outside; I do not know this authority’s internal processes.
I received the page containing this sentence only on 14.07.2026 — twenty days after the decision of 24.06.2026 against which I should have been able to use it to defend myself. It was precisely the second page missing from the version previously sent (Annex 132_F2): there, the first page of the reasons was followed immediately by the final page.
And on the same page the Prosecutor General’s Office itself acknowledges that a full admission of guilt is not an indispensable requirement and denial of the offence alone cannot support a negative social prognosis. Nevertheless, it is precisely the failure to acknowledge the offence that is used against my release.
This sentence already appears almost word for word in the diagnostic assessment of Moabit prison (JVA Moabit) of 17.04.2026 — that is, five weeks earlier and from a different body. What is established is therefore the copying of wording. Whether the Prosecutor General’s Office independently examined the files, I cannot determine from outside; I do not know this authority’s internal processes.
I received the page containing this sentence only on 14.07.2026 — twenty days after the decision of 24.06.2026 against which I should have been able to use it to defend myself. It was precisely the second page missing from the version previously sent (Annex 132_F2): there, the first page of the reasons was followed immediately by the final page.
And on the same page the Prosecutor General’s Office itself acknowledges that a full admission of guilt is not an indispensable requirement and denial of the offence alone cannot support a negative social prognosis. Nevertheless, it is precisely the failure to acknowledge the offence that is used against my release.
Position in the chain. Source of the wording: Annex 137_F2 · The full chain: The missing link
Note: this page summarises the content relevant to the prognosis and does not reproduce the document in full. The original is linked. Assessments are identified as such and do not replace a judicial finding.