⚖ Urgent: criminal defence lawyer sought — outside Berlin
Political prisoner, application lodged with the European Court of Human Rights (EGMR), threat of deportation. Unprecedented resistance from the Berlin prosecution service is to be expected. The lawyer must be based outside Berlin.
Details →Case 2 · Own response · 27.07.2026 · 2 Ws 111/26
Annex 150_F2 — response to the statement of the Prosecutor General’s Office (Generalstaatsanwaltschaft)
My response to the application of the Prosecutor General’s Office (Generalstaatsanwaltschaft) of 14.07.2026. The central point: the application does not address a single one of the procedural facts I specifically challenged.
I again documented that I did not know the complete statement of 26.05.2026 before the hearing, and that lawful complaints, hunger strikes against blocked legal protection, publication of official documents, political activity and maintaining my innocence must not be treated as signs of dangerousness without a concrete factual basis.
Applications: set aside the order of 24.06.2026, provide full access to the file and a renewed opportunity to submit a statement; alternatively, decide the immediate complaint (sofortige Beschwerde) only after fully affording the right to be heard.
Date note — openly identified by the author: The written submission is dated 27.07.2026, but the fax report gives the transmission time as 25.07.2026 at 17:54, seven pages, transmission “OK”. The discrepancy is openly recorded here rather than harmonised.
I again documented that I did not know the complete statement of 26.05.2026 before the hearing, and that lawful complaints, hunger strikes against blocked legal protection, publication of official documents, political activity and maintaining my innocence must not be treated as signs of dangerousness without a concrete factual basis.
Applications: set aside the order of 24.06.2026, provide full access to the file and a renewed opportunity to submit a statement; alternatively, decide the immediate complaint (sofortige Beschwerde) only after fully affording the right to be heard.
Date note — openly identified by the author: The written submission is dated 27.07.2026, but the fax report gives the transmission time as 25.07.2026 at 17:54, seven pages, transmission “OK”. The discrepancy is openly recorded here rather than harmonised.
Position in the chain. The public part of the same statement: Annex 151_F2. The challenged order: Annex 139_F2.
Source of information: the chronology of case 2 maintained by Dmitry Bagrash. This page summarises the material content rather than reproducing the document in full; the original is linked. Assessments are identified as such and do not replace a judicial finding.