⚖ Urgent: criminal defence lawyer sought — outside Berlin
Political prisoner, application lodged with the ECtHR, threatened with deportation. Unprecedented resistance from the Berlin prosecution service is expected. The lawyer must be based outside Berlin.
Details →Case 2 · President of Berlin Regional Court I (LG Berlin I) · received 09.07.2026 · 589f StVK 86/26
Annex 153_F2 — Rejection of the administrative supervision complaint (Dienstaufsichtsbeschwerde) of 25.06.2026 — the official statement remains undisclosed
The response to my complaint under administrative supervision (Dienstaufsichtsbeschwerde) of 25.06.2026 concerning proceedings 589f StVK 86/26. It states that the complaint was examined, the specialist case-management application consulted and an official statement obtained from the competent judge of the chamber for matters concerning execution of sentences. The result: no conduct relevant to administrative supervision could be identified; no further measures would be taken.
The official statement obtained was not sent to me. The response contains no comprehensible examination of the individual objections. In particular, it remains unexplained how the late and incomplete sending of documents material to the decision, the failure to decide the press application, and the documentation of the hearing were examined.
The letter thus confirms that a statement by the judge exists — while leaving its content undisclosed.
The official statement obtained was not sent to me. The response contains no comprehensible examination of the individual objections. In particular, it remains unexplained how the late and incomplete sending of documents material to the decision, the failure to decide the press application, and the documentation of the hearing were examined.
The letter thus confirms that a statement by the judge exists — while leaving its content undisclosed.
Position in the chain. The underlying complaint is Annex 135_F2. The same pattern of reasoning in the proceedings concerning VRiLG Groß (Presiding Judge at the Regional Court): Annex 147_F2.
Source of the information: the chronology of Case 2, maintained by Dmitry Bagrash. This page summarises the relevant content and does not reproduce the document in full; the original is linked. Assessments are identified as such and do not replace a judicial finding.