W-01Social ties
“He has many contacts within and outside Germany…”Sentence and reintegration plan, 17.04.2026 (annex 115_F2)
“In this respect, the convicted person reported no social contacts or ties.”Order on suspension of the remainder of the sentence, 24.06.2026 (annex 139_F2)
The same person, six weeks, two official documents — both times to his disadvantage.
W-02Prior convictions
“Number of prior convictions or earlier measures: 0” … “Observe deletion and the prohibition on use under §§ 51, 52 BZRG!”Personal record sheet of JVA Heidering (Heidering prison), as of 29.05.2026
“…reveals a fundamental readiness to act dissocially…”Diagnostic procedure, prognosis, p. 12 — derived from a conviction in 2000
Both statements come from the same collection of case documents. The warning appears on the sheet whose annex disregards it.
W-03The established facts
The chamber examines whether the prison authority proceeded on correctly and fully established facts, and answers yes.Order of the Landgericht Berlin I (Berlin Regional Court I), 31.07.2026 (annex 157_F2)
The documentation of the applicant’s actions to obtain legal protection, attached as “QR codes”, “was not scanned and viewed by the Strafvollstreckungskammer (sentence enforcement chamber)”.The same order, point 4
The completeness of the authority’s facts is confirmed, while the applicant’s own evidence remains unseen because it was “not in the appropriate form”.
W-04Activism
“Engagement in activism or the exercise of one’s own rights is in principle not to be regarded as problematic, provided it remains within the law.”Sentence and reintegration plan, 17.04.2026
“The risk of misuse arises from the current strong focus on the fight against the German justice system…”The same plan, 17.04.2026
What the document calls a “fight against the German justice system” consists of complaints, applications, petitions and press statements.
W-05Treatment
“In principle, a need for therapeutic treatment is identified.”Diagnostic procedure, p. 14
“An indication for treatment is, however, … not established, as the current prospects of success are low.”The same document, p. 14
Later, the absence of working through the offence contributes to the refusal of release.
W-06The confession
A comprehensive admission of guilt is said not to be an indispensable requirement, and denial alone cannot support a negative social prognosis.Statement of the Generalstaatsanwaltschaft (Prosecutor General’s Office), 26.05.2026
The absence of working through the offence contributes to the refusal to suspend the remainder of the sentence.Order, 24.06.2026
The standard and its application come from the same proceedings.
W-07Access to court
“…the entitlement … develops into an entitlement to being escorted to court.” The prison is not entitled to conduct a “preliminary examination”; it had “rightly” decided in future to arrange the escort “directly” and “unconditionally”.Order of the Kammergericht (Berlin Higher Regional Court), 12.06.2026 (annex 142_F2)
The Rechtsbeschwerde (complaint on points of law) is dismissed as inadmissible.The same order, 12.06.2026
The standard is set, the practice is corrected, and the complaint fails.
W-08The duty to forward the complaint
“…to forward the complaint to the court dealing with complaints immediately, at the latest before three days have elapsed.”§ 306 Abs. 2 Halbsatz 2 StPO, statutory text
“…merely a provision that should generally be followed (Sollvorschrift) … with no direct procedural consequences…”Order of the Kammergericht, 31.10.2025 (annex 82_F2)
Here the decision stands against the wording of the law, rather than another decision.
W-09Father and child
“Number of children: 0”Personal record sheet of JVA Heidering (Heidering prison), as of 29.05.2026
Measure: “fathers’ group / coaching for fathers to strengthen the father–son relationship”Sentence and reintegration plan, point 4.1
The same authority, the same matter. Point 12 of the same plan mentions “existing family ties, particularly with his son”.
W-10The son’s age
“…with his son Max (14 years old)…”Diagnostic procedure, 12.03.2026 (annex 137_F2)
“…to call his 16-year-old son regularly.”Lechner’s order, 24.06.2026 (annex 139_F2)
My son was born on 31.08.2010. On 12.03.2026 he was fifteen, and on 24.06.2026 he was also fifteen. Two official documents, two months apart, two incorrect ages in opposite directions — neither correct.
Ten pairs, twenty statements: nineteen from state documents and one from my own family memory. If you then want to know how this came about: