Submissions ignored — proceedings 2 Ws 111/26
In the ongoing complaint proceedings before the Kammergericht (Berlin Higher Regional Court, case reference 2 Ws 111/26), a pattern repeats: my specific procedural complaints are not addressed on their merits but set aside with a blanket reference to the reasons in the challenged order.
With detailed grounds, a complaint of a violation of the right to be heard and an application for the complete case file to be sent.
Requests dismissal of the complaint as unfounded, “with reference to the reasons in the order of 24.06.2026”. None of the specific facts raised (incomplete transmission of the case file, exclusion of the press, complaint of a violation of the right to be heard) is addressed.
I opposed the Prosecutor General’s Office’s application and again documented that I had not known the full statement of 26.05.2026 before the hearing, and that lawful complaints, hunger strikes, publications and my insistence on my innocence must not be used as indicators of dangerousness without a specific factual basis.
Assessment
The fax reports and receipt dates show that I became aware of the full decisive statement of 26.05.2026 only on 21.07.2026, after the hearing and the order refusing relief. Nevertheless, both the order and the subsequent statement of the Prosecutor General’s Office use my procedurally permissible conduct (legal remedies, hunger strike, publication, assertions of innocence) against me without resolving this contradiction. The outcome of the proceedings remains open, case reference 2 Ws 111/26.