Under the applicable law, contact with a state-recognised religious community constituted under public law may not be restricted under any circumstances. After it became known that I was seeking new lawyers through the Jewish community for an investigation into Oberstaatsanwalt Wachs (OStA, senior public prosecutor), this contact was systematically denied to me for months.

05.08.2024
Application to enable calls to the telephone number of the Chabad Berlin Jewish community

Application to the Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Berlin (Berlin Prosecutor General’s Office) to enable calls to telephone number 030/21280830.

Source: annex 20_F3
30.08.2024
Oral refusal by OStA Wachs

The social worker at JVA Moabit (Moabit prison), Ms Gaedke, informed me of an oral refusal by OStA Wachs, accompanied by a prohibition on giving me the written decision.

09.09.2024
Application for a judicial decision: telephone contact with Rabbi Segal

I applied for judicial permission to contact Rabbi Segal by telephone and for a finding that withholding OStA Wachs’s refusal decision was unlawful.

Source: annex 1_F3
17.10.2024
Vorsitzender Richter am Landgericht Groß (VRiLG, presiding judge at the Regional Court) expresses satisfaction with the refusal

In a letter without a prescribed form, Judge Groß set my application aside, expressed satisfaction with the refusal of telephone contact and also refused the requested information on appeal rights. He said nothing about the withholding of the written refusal.

Source: annex 2_F3
25.10. – 05.11.2024
Repeated applications to enable calls

Several further applications to the management of JVA Moabit to enable calls to the telephone numbers of the Jewish community and the Zentralrat der Juden (Central Council of Jews), each with a detailed explanation of the legal position.

Source: annexes 4_F3, 5_F3, 7_F3
24.10.2024
Application for unmonitored contact with Rabbi Shmuel

In a separate declaration recorded by the Rechtspflegerin (a judicial officer with independent procedural duties), I expressly applied for permission for an unmonitored telephone call with another rabbi under § 119 Abs. 4 Nr. 18 i.V.m. § 53 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 StPO.

Source: court record of AG Tiergarten (Tiergarten Local Court), 24.10.2024

Assessment

According to my own reconstruction of the chronology, this systematic denial began immediately after the competent authorities learned, following LKA observation of a lawyer’s visit, that I was seeking new legal support through the Jewish community for an investigation into OStA Wachs. This temporal connection is my own assessment; there is no formal proof of a causal link.