Under § 37 StPO, a court must forward incoming legal remedies to the competent instance without delay. In my case, several supplements to the appeal on points of law (Revision) and complaints remained with VRiLG Groß, without any forwarding or even acknowledgement of receipt being communicated to me.

20.01.2025
Supplement to the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision) on the record at the court registry

I submitted a supplement to the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision) on the record at the Regional Court (Landgericht) registry — requesting that it be forwarded without delay to the competent appellate court.

03.02.2025
Application to the Kammergericht (Berlin Higher Regional Court): compel forwarding

Because neither forwarding nor confirmation under § 37 StPO occurred, I applied to the Kammergericht Berlin (Berlin Higher Regional Court) to require VRiLG Groß to forward without delay my supplement to the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision) and several complaints (including under § 198 GVG, § 304 StPO). At the same time, I requested an investigation against VRiLG Groß on suspicion of obstruction of prosecution in public office (§ 258a StGB) and perversion of justice (Rechtsbeugung, § 339 StGB).

I also challenged deliberate deception concerning supposedly expired deadlines on 12.12.2024 and 16.01.2025.

Source: Annex 13_F2
Following period — repeated applications
Further applications for forwarding and status enquiries

Complaints about judicial inactivity (13.01.2025), supplements to them (21.01.2025) and an application under § 198 GVG concerning excessive length of proceedings (07.04.2025) remained part of the same recurring pattern: responses without a prescribed form, or no responses, to submissions subject to deadlines.

Source: Annexes 10_F2, 11_F2, 31_F2

Assessment

My legal assessment of these events — including whether and when the submissions concerned were actually forwarded to the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court of Justice) — is set out in greater detail on the analysis page, which compares this subject in detail with the relevant BGH (Federal Court of Justice) orders.

The escalation of 30.03.2026 — four letters, four levels

For months, there was no evidence that the complaint on points of law (Rechtsbeschwerde) of 13.01.2026 (AG Zossen, file reference 131 AR 1/26) against the LG Berlin I (Berlin Regional Court I) order of 10.12.2025 in proceedings 599 StVK 215/25 Vollz had been submitted to the Kammergericht (Berlin Higher Regional Court). On 30.03.2026, I brought the same matter simultaneously to four bodies, each with a deadline of 72 hours:

  • Annex 102_F2 — to the Kammergericht (Berlin Higher Regional Court): renewed precautionary submission and request for the file
  • Annex 103_F2 — to the President of LG Berlin I (Berlin Regional Court I): escalation through service supervision
  • Annex 104_F2 — to the President of the Kammergericht (Berlin Higher Regional Court): notification through service supervision
  • Annex 105_F2 — to the Senatsverwaltung für Justiz (Senate Administration for Justice): final demand through substantive administrative supervision

Copies of all four also went to the President of the House of Representatives, the Petitions Committee and the Legal Affairs Committee. The matter has therefore been before the Berlin parliament since March 2026.