Criminal complaint against Groß and Wachs: the Prosecutor General’s Office decides on the complaint against its own prosecutor
Complaint of 2 September 2026, expressly requesting a transfer outside Berlin. On 29 September 2026 the Berlin Prosecutor General’s Office passed it to the Berlin Public Prosecutor’s Office under its supervision — without a word on that request, without a case number. On 12 October 2026: four follow-up letters delivered by fax, Bundestag petition supplemented. On 14 October 2026 the Prosecutor General’s Office itself refused the transfer; Berlin Public Prosecutor’s case number: 232 Js 4326/26.
⚖ Defence found — a host organisation for the legal aid fund is sought
Reopening the case: a defence team outside Berlin is ready. Sought: a non-profit organisation to hold the donations — the money goes to the defence, not to me.
Details →Chronology archive
All documented events from the five chapters of these proceedings — in chronological order, with direct references to the corresponding documents and annexes. This chronology presents Dmitry Bagrash’s perspective and legal assessment and does not replace a judicial decision.
The chapters of this documentation
Political background — two statements by the Russian Federation before the OSCE (OSZE), the second sixteen days before the alleged offence · The criminal proceedings — judgment of 22.07.2024 — and the list of provisions that arrived 373 days later · Access to court — six documented refusals to record procedural submissions between January and March 2025 · Denied contact with the Jewish community — a pastoral contact on which a decision has been pending for years · Threats and pressure in custody — the prison itself speaks of a “threat situation to be taken seriously”
Political background — two statements by the Russian Federation before the OSCE (OSZE), the second sixteen days before the alleged offence · The criminal proceedings — judgment of 22.07.2024 — and the list of provisions that arrived 373 days later · Access to court — six documented refusals to record procedural submissions between January and March 2025 · Denied contact with the Jewish community — a pastoral contact on which a decision has been pending for years · Threats and pressure in custody — the prison itself speaks of a “threat situation to be taken seriously”
Complaint against Groß and Wachs: original and fax report
Anlage 225_F2: 15-page package. Anlage 199_F2, page 1: transmission at 17:00, OK.
Open document →The Prosecutor General’s Office passes the complaint against its own prosecutor to the prosecution office under its supervision — without a word on bias
Ref. 163 AR 392/26. Referral “for reasons of jurisdiction” to the Berlin Public Prosecutor’s Office, 27 days after the complaint was received — on the day of my status enquiry (Anlage 234_F2). No case number, not a word on the requested transfer outside Berlin. Source: Anlage 224_F2 (transcription).
Open document →35 days after the complaint: the referral notice reaches me
Received on 7 October 2026 at 17:20 — 35 days after the complaint, 8 days after the date of the letter. Source: receipt annotation recorded in Anlage 224_F2.
Open document →226_F2: Prosecutor General’s Office — delivered by fax
Delivered by fax on 12 October 2026 at 17:50 to the Berlin Prosecutor General’s Office (030 9015 2727): 18 of 18 pages, confirmed by the receiving machine. Transmission report: Anlage 230_F2.
Open document →227_F2: Berlin Public Prosecutor’s Office — delivered by fax
Delivered by fax on 12 October 2026 at 17:52 to the Berlin Public Prosecutor’s Office (030 9014 3310): 18 of 18 pages, confirmed by the receiving machine. Transmission report: Anlage 231_F2.
Open document →228_F2: Senate justice administration — delivered by fax
Delivered by fax on 12 October 2026 at 18:37 to the Senate Department for Justice and Consumer Protection (030 9013 2000): 27 pages transmitted (the package has 29 pages), transmission OK. Transmission report: Anlage 232_F2.
Open document →229_F2: Berlin Petitions Committee — delivered by fax
Delivered by fax on 12 October 2026 at 18:30 to the Petitions Committee of the Berlin House of Representatives (030 2325 1478): 27 pages transmitted (the package has 29 pages), transmission OK. Transmission report: Anlage 233_F2.
Open document →Bundestag petition E-208090 supplemented: who examines when the examining authority itself is concerned?
By e-mail to the secretariat of the Petitions Committee of the German Bundestag, with the criminal complaint (Anlage 225_F2) attached. Federal-law questions: no rule in the StPO or GVG for complaints against members of the examining authority; no duty to communicate the decision on an objection of bias; the lawyer requirement of § 172(3) StPO for prisoners without counsel. Source: Anlage 235_F2.
Open document →Prosecutor General’s Office: case number 232 Js 4326/26 – transfer outside Berlin refused
In a letter dated 14 October 2026 (ref. 163 AR 392/26; produced 19 October 2026; received by me on 21 October 2026) the Berlin Prosecutor General’s Office replies to my follow-up letter of 12 October 2026. The Berlin Public Prosecutor’s Office has opened proceedings on my complaint of 2 September 2026 under case number 232 Js 4326/26. On my request for a transfer: “Allein die Tatsache, dass sich das Verfahren gegen Justizbedienstete des Landes Berlin richtet, bietet für sich genommen keinen Anlass, das Verfahren an eine auswärtige Staatsanwaltschaft abzugeben” (“The mere fact that the proceedings are directed against judicial employees of the Land of Berlin does not in itself give reason to transfer them to a prosecutor’s office elsewhere”). Signed by a Leitende Oberstaatsanwältin (chief senior prosecutor) of the Prosecutor General’s Office. Source: Anlage 241_F2 (transcript).
Open document →Supervisory complaint: Senate Department asked to review the Prosecutor General’s refusal to transfer
In a letter of 22 October 2026 I lodge a supervisory complaint with the Senate Department for Justice as the supervisory authority (§ 147 No. 2 GVG) against the Prosecutor General’s decision of 14 October 2026 not to transfer proceedings 232 Js 4326/26. Reques…
Open document →Berlin Public Prosecutor’s Office, 232 Js 4326/26: question on department, reporting and overlapping personnel
In a letter of 22 October 2026 I ask the Berlin Public Prosecutor’s Office, regarding 232 Js 4326/26, to name the handling department and desk, to say whether the case is a reporting matter to the Prosecutor General’s Office or instructions have been given, an…
Open document →Federal Constitutional Court: second constitutional complaint now 2 BvR 1974/26 – assigned to the competent chamber
In a letter dated 16 October 2026 (postmarked 21 October 2026, handed to me in JVA Heidering on 23 October 2026) the Federal Constitutional Court informs me that my constitutional complaint of 1/2 September 2026, until now kept in the general register as AR 62…
Open document →Sentence-plan conference: open prison “only with offence work” – no other obstacles
On 23 October 2026 at about 09:30 I was called from work to the sentence-plan conference. Present: the new head of House 1, Ms Metz, the group leader Ms Dahms and the social worker Ms Mahlow. Ms Metz stated: no drug problem, no violations, very good feedback f…
Open document →Application for a court decision: outcome of the sentence-plan conference taken to the enforcement chamber
In an application of 26 October 2026 under §§ 109 et seq. StVollzG to the Regional Court Berlin I – sentence enforcement chamber – I ask the court: to set aside the decision making open prison and relaxations depend solely on “offence work”, and the plan updat…
Open document →Disciplinary complaint against the head of House 1, Ms Metz
In a letter of 26 October 2026 to the management of JVA Heidering, copied to the Senate Department for Justice as supervisory authority, I lodge a disciplinary complaint against Ms Metz: (1) relaxations and open prison only in exchange for “offence work”, alth…
Open document →Court: the ban was unlawful. Prison: no breach of duty. Disciplinary complaint against Mr Lohmeier rejected
In a decision dated 16 October 2026, handed to me on 27 October 2026, the governor of JVA Heidering rejects as unfounded my disciplinary complaint of 1 October 2026 against Mr Lohmeier: the officer had commented on the allegations; after examination no breach …
Open document →Written sentence plan handed over: 14 pages, unsigned – the condition stands
On 27 October 2026 I was handed the written update of my sentence and integration plan: 14 pages, without a signature and without the name of an officer, only an abbreviation. On my first reading it confirms what was said at the conference of 23 October 2026: …
Open document →Supervisory complaint to the Senate Department and access request: who examined what?
I am taking the decision of 16 October 2026 to the Senate Department for Justice and Consumer Protection as supervisory authority (Anlage 256_F2). I ask it to state which duties were examined and on what findings the denial of a breach rests; to decide on my s…
Open document →Phone charges doubled, prison silent for eight weeks: application to the enforcement chamber
Since 17 August 2026 the operator of the in-cell media system, the Telio group, has charged higher per-minute prices: calls to German mobile networks cost 0.04 instead of 0.02 euros (+100 %), abroad up to 0.19 instead of 0.02 euros (+850 %); German landlines s…
Open document →Reply to Ms Metz: a conversation yes – with a record and a witness. There will be no confession
The social worker repeatedly offered me a private meeting with the head of House 1, Ms Metz, and would not give her first name. I replied to Ms Metz in writing: I am ready to talk – with a written agenda, a record with a copy for me and a person I trust as a w…
Open document →Court of Appeal rejects my appeal on points of law: an unsigned sentence plan is no defect
By order of 24 September 2026 (5 Ws 165/26), sent to me on 28 September 2026, the Kammergericht (5th Criminal Senate) rejected as inadmissible my appeal on points of law against the order of the Regional Court Berlin I of 31 July 2026 (595 StVK 68/26 Vollz). I…
Open document →Regional Court: the five-day delay of the letter with my draft appeal was unlawful
By order of 2 October 2026 (595 StVK 134/26 Vollz), received on 8 October 2026, the Regional Court Berlin I finds that handing me registered letter RT508494813DE only on 25 August 2026, although it reached JVA Heidering on 19 August 2026, was unlawful and viol…
Open document →Mr Lohmeier on the complaint against himself: a need for legal protection is “already questionable”
By letter of 8 October 2026, signed “Im Auftrag Lohmeier”, the officer against whom my disciplinary complaint is directed informs me that video calls have been unblocked since 15 September 2026. My complaint against him was received on 30 September 2026; I wil…
Open document →Petitions Committee closes the expulsion petition – and records: the Federal Office found a ban on deportation to Russia
By letter of 10 September 2026 (ref. 7119/19, Ms Herzog), received on 25 September 2026, the Petitions Committee of the Berlin House of Representatives closes my petition of 21 May 2026 against the intended expulsion. It reproduces the statement of the Senate …
Open document →Petitions Committee: references 7636/19 (phone charges) and 7637/19 (court decisions, video calls)
By two letters of 22 September 2026, received on 29 September 2026, the Petitions Committee of the House of Representatives confirms receipt of my submissions of 7 September 2026 – ref. 7636/19, “complaint about the doubling of phone charges in the Berlin pris…
Open document →The Federal Office sends me an asylum application form – “if you wish to pursue asylum proceedings”
By letter of 5 October 2026 (ref. 10866144-160), formally served on 8 October 2026, the Federal Office for Migration and Refugees replies to my letter of 26 May 2026, in which I had asked for a full clarification of all asylum, refugee, human-rights and family…
Open document →The sentence plan verbatim: complaints, e-mails and publications as reasons against open prison
The written sentence and reintegration plan of JVA Heidering of 26 October 2026 (conference 23 October 2026, handed over 27 October 2026) is now available as a scan: 14 pages and an overview of measures. It names no person. Conference participants: “TAL’in 1; …
Open document →Phone account can no longer be topped up from outside: “Number not found”
Since 31 October 2026 at the latest, relatives and supporters can no longer top up my phone account 127-281-20 in the in-cell media system of the operator Telio. Three people tried independently at different times, on a computer and on mobile phones. mytel.io …
Open document →Potsdam prosecutor and Brandenburg Landtag Petitions Committee: secure evidence, question witnesses
On 1 November 2026 two letters of 31 October 2026 on case 496 Js 34084/26 were delivered by fax: to the Potsdam public prosecutor (12:20, 8 pages, FAX-ID 17708322) and to the Petitions Committee of the Brandenburg Landtag (12:40, 8 pages, FAX-ID 17708318). Eac…
Open document →Sentence plan submitted to the court: external expert opinion, access to files and names of those responsible requested
On 2 November 2026 I submitted the written sentence plan of 26 October 2026 verbatim to the enforcement chamber and supplemented my application (17 pages, 13:47, FAX-ID 17715131). I suggest obtaining an opinion from an external expert who does not belong to th…
Open document →National Agency for the Prevention of Torture and European anti-torture committee (CPT) informed
On 2 November 2026 I informed the German National Agency for the Prevention of Torture (12:59, FAX-ID 17715156, also by e-mail) and the Council of Europe’s European Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT, 12:53, FAX-ID 17715119) about my conditions of de…
Open document →Correction on outdoor exercise and request to the House of Representatives: why do fellow prisoners who threatened me keep ending up near me?
My letters of 2 November 2026 said that since 2024 I have stayed away from outdoor exercise out of concern for my safety. That was inaccurate. I do not fear for my safety in the yard. I voluntarily stay away from outdoor exercise and leave my cell only to work…
Open document →Searched away from my belongings, name refused – and my precautionary declaration
On 5 November 2026 at about 14:27, returning from work to house 1, I was searched – unlike other prisoners not next to my belongings but three to four metres away, without reason or record, under threat of force although I was willing to be searched. Nothing w…
Open document →Senate Department passes my complaint about the Prosecutor General’s Office to the Prosecutor General’s Office
On 3 November 2026 I received the Senate Department for Justice’s reply of 26 October 2026 (ref. III C 5-3133-1234/2026/E/7) to my complaint of 21 October 2026 against the Prosecutor General’s decision not to have the complaint against senior prosecutor Wachs …
Open document →Phone account can be topped up again – according to the operator a fault, not a block; outage of phone and TV on 3 November 2026 resolved
Since 2 November 2026 payments into my phone account 127-281-20 are possible again; a first top-up has arrived. Telio wrote to me on 4 November 2026: “The fault concerned payments via the cyou.org website and was fixed on Monday; there was no account-specific …
Open document →Federal Prosecutor General asked to examine whether a foreign intelligence service was involved
On 6 November 2026 I asked the Federal Prosecutor General at the Federal Court of Justice to examine whether there are sufficient indications that a foreign intelligence service was involved in the events that led to my conviction (§ 99 StGB). Delivered by fax…
Open document →Sentence plan: the deadline “no later than 13.09.2026” has passed — application for a plan conference
The sentence-plan conference took place on 13 March 2026 at JVA Moabit; the plan of 17 April 2026 itself fixes its update for “no later than 13.09.2026”. To date there has been neither a conference nor a date. In my application of 15 October 2026 to the management of JVA Heidering, for the attention of Mr Lars Lohmeier, I demand the conference within two weeks, a written explanation and the names of those responsible. The letter is at the same time the application for action under § 113(1) StVollzG; a copy goes to the Senate Department for Justice as the supervisory authority. Source: Anlage 236_F2.
Open document →Status enquiry to the Prosecutor General’s Office — its reply is dated the same day
After 27 days without an acknowledgement of receipt I ask by e-mail about the receipt, case number, responsible unit and referral of my criminal complaint of 2 September 2026; in parallel, a press enquiry to the press office. The Prosecutor General’s Office’s letter ref. 163 AR 392/26 is dated the same day and refers to the “submissions of 2 and 29 September 2026”. Source: Anlage 234_F2.
Open document →Filed in time: 83 pages to the Federal Constitutional Court (AR 6264/26)
On 22 September 2026 at 19:17 a supporter, acting on my behalf, faxed to the Federal Constitutional Court (0721 9101-382) the documents requested in its letter of 7 September 2026: the supplementary letter of 22 September 2026, the complaint to the Kammergericht of 1 July 2026 (Anlage 140_F2) and annexes 1–7, 10, 12 and 14 of the constitutional complaint — 83 pages, transmission OK, FAX-ID 17451605. The one-month deadline under § 93(1) BVerfGG expired on 25 September 2026; the documents arrived three days earlier. Source: Anlage 240_F2.
Open document →Status enquiry to the Federal Constitutional Court on both constitutional complaints
In a letter of 20 October 2026 I ask the Federal Constitutional Court about the status. On 2 BvR 1314/26 (received 10 July 2026, 102 days since without further word): whether the complaint has been served under § 94 BVerfGG and whether any documents are missing. On AR 6264/26: whether the supplement of 22 September 2026 (83 pages) arrived in full, whether the case has been moved to the register of proceedings and under which reference, and whether any documents are still missing. I also ask that letters be posted promptly: the letter of 7 September 2026 reached me only after 14 days, four days before the deadline. Source: Anlage 239_F2.
Open document →First public display of the “Putin is a Killer” banner
First appearance of the “Putin is a Killer” banner outside the Russian embassy — photographed by the police without objection.
Open document →
24-hour democracy camp outside the Brandenburg Gate
One month continuously visible at the Brandenburg Gate. Around 95 % of passers-by photograph the installation — not a single complaint.
Open document →
Seizure of the banner on the instructions of Senior Public Prosecutor (Oberstaatsanwalt) Raupach
On the first day of the Duma election, Senior Prosecutor Raupach orders the immediate seizure of the banner — the officer carrying out the order states that every objection was rejected.
Open document →
Press article about the police seizure
BILD journalist Julian Röpcke documents the seizure with a photograph and video — independently of my own account.
Open document →
Judicial confirmation of the seizure — Judge Dr. Fricke
Tiergarten Local Court (Amtsgericht Tiergarten) confirms the lawfulness of the seizure — Judge Dr. Fricke, the same judge who issues the warrant for my arrest on 14.12.2022.
Open document →
First statement by the Russian delegation before the OSCE (OSZE)
The delegation of the Russian Federation mentions Unkremlin e. V. before the OSCE (OSZE). The Permanent Council meeting (No. 1336) took place on 23.09.2021; document PC.DEL/1483/21 was circulated by the conference service on 24.09.2021 — hence the two dates on this website.
Open document →
Vehicle fire — documented by a third party
A vehicle fire documented by a third party. No discontinuance decision received by me is available.
Open document →
Post on the personal Facebook page
Publication on my personal Facebook page — later deleted while the Regional Court (Landgericht), Wachs and Groß had access to the account.
Open document →
Second statement by the Russian delegation before the OSCE
Second statement by the Russian delegation before the OSCE (OSZE) — sixteen days before the time when, according to the judgment, the device is alleged to have been deposited.
Open document →
Proceedings on the complaint against KK Weiß are discontinued — and the legal remedy is barred without a lawyer
The Prosecutor General’s Office (Generalstaatsanwaltschaft) discontinues proceedings on the criminal complaint against Criminal Police Inspector (Kriminalkommissar) Weiß. An application for a court order compelling prosecution (Klageerzwingungsantrag) requires a lawyer (§ 172 para. 3 StPO) — the same mechanism that now threatens the complaint against Groß and Wachs.
Open document →
Final written representations on the video call ban — and the question of the rule I am alleged to have broken
Seven pages by fax at 02:30 to Berlin Regional Court I (Landgericht Berlin I) in proceedings 595 StVK 126/26 Vollz, together with an application under § 114 para. 2 StVollzG and an open statement...
Open document →
Regional Court dismisses the application challenging the sentence and reintegration plan — documentation unread
Order of the 95th chamber for matters concerning execution of sentences in proceedings 595 StVK 68/26 Vollz, received on 11.08.2026. The chamber expressly records that it did not examine the documentation submitted...
Open document →
Regional Court forwards the prison’s (JVA) statement on the video call ban and sets a three-week deadline
In proceedings 595 StVK 126/26 Vollz, the Regional Court forwarded the statement of JVA Heidering of 28.07.2026 with its annexes; received on 05.08.2026 at 19:20...
Open document →
The institution corrects its decision: no aggression established, suspension lifted
After examining the camera recordings, JVA Heidering finds that I was not the aggressor. The suspension is lifted and lost earnings are reimbursed in full...
Open document →
Final written representations on the video call ban
Application for interim legal protection in proceedings 595 StVK 126/26 Vollz, accompanied by an open statement. An instruction from the Senate administration (Senatsverwaltung) is expressly not alleged...
Open document →
Three court letters in proceedings 595 StVK 126/26
Dismissal of the application challenging the sentence plan, forwarding of the JVA statement and setting of a one-week deadline for the prison...
Open document →
Kammergericht (Berlin Higher Regional Court) dismisses the appeal — judicial remedies are exhausted
The 2nd criminal division (Strafsenat) considers an expert report unnecessary because suspension of the remainder of the sentence (Aussetzung) was “ruled out from the outset” — because of an attribution for which no evidence is identified...
Open document →
Visual inspection without objection — five days while the deadline was running
The prison explains the delay in the item containing the draft appeal on points of law (Rechtsbeschwerde) by an inspection under § 36 StVollzG Berlin that resulted in “no objections whatsoever”...
Open document →
Constitutional complaint and criminal complaint transmitted
The constitutional complaint was received by the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) at 17:16, and the criminal complaint by the Prosecutor General’s Office at 17:00. Also a correction: the president’s fax number had been wrong since March...
Open document →
The documents for the appeal on points of law (Rechtsbeschwerde) have not been in my possession since 02.09.2026
A social worker took the prepared text and the challenged order to fax them to Zossen Local Court (Amtsgericht Zossen) and promised to return them the following day. They were not returned. The deadline expires on 11.09.2026...
Open document →
The prison replies to the court — and identifies refraining from publications as a less restrictive measure
The statement of 25.08.2026 records that I had reportedly not used the opportunity to refrain from this use in future. The same activity that the prison calls “journalist” in its own master data is called “self-presentation” in the pleading...
Open document →
Karlsruhe registers the constitutional complaint of 10.07.2026: 2 BvR 1314/26
I received the case reference on 07.09.2026 at 17:20, 59 days after filing. What it means — and what it does not mean. There is still no case reference for the second complaint...
Open document →
Time limit met: the appeal on points of law (Rechtsbeschwerde) lodged on the record — in restraints where none were customary in January
Two days before the deadline, the escorted visit to the court registry officer authorised to record applications (Urkundsbeamter) takes place. Civilian clothing denied, continuous restraints — unlike a comparable escorted visit in January 2026. The time limit is met...
Open document →
Four replies within a week — and an expunged prior conviction in the sentence plan
The Regional Court, Senate administration, Petitions Committee (three file references) and JVA reply almost simultaneously. At the same time, in the appeal on points of law (Rechtsbeschwerde) of 09.09.2026, I object that the sentence plan uses a prior conviction expunged in 2000...
Open document →
Federal mail takes eleven days — and the period coincides with the first delay
The Bundestag Petitions Committee confirms receipt of my letter, case reference Pet 1-21-06-99999-023282. Posted 04.-08.09.2026, received by me only on 15.09.2026 — the second documented case within a few weeks...
Open document →
The Regional Court (Landgericht) sets aside the decision blocking video calls as unlawful
Order of 11.09.2026, 595 StVK 126/26 Vollz: the decision of JVA Heidering of 22.07.2026 is set aside; according to the court, the statutory conditions for a ban were not met. Costs: 9/10 JVA, 1/10 applicant...
Open document →
Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht): notice of missing documents, case reference AR 6264/26, deadline 25.09.2026
Letter of 07.09.2026 concerning the second constitutional complaint: it states that the written appeal to the Kammergericht had not been submitted. Received only on 21.09.2026 — four days before the deadline...
Open document →
Senate administration answers the video call ban question by referring to Google — the order of 11.09.2026 is not mentioned
Written reply of 14.09.2026 to six submissions: on the question of the information route, I am told to Google it myself. The order that set aside the video call ban as unlawful three days earlier is not mentioned...
Open document →
Berlin Regional Court I (Landgericht Berlin I) opens new proceedings: 595 StVK 134/26 Vollz
Two letters of 18.09.2026: the court forwards my letter of 17.09.2026 to JVA Heidering and sets the prison a deadline of 10 days to submit its statement...
Open document →
Complaint concerning supervision of the performance of official duties (Dienstaufsichtsbeschwerde) against MTAL Lohmeier after the video call ban was set aside
Following the court order of 11.09.2026, I request examination of personal responsibility for the decision that was set aside under the law governing official service, without prejudging whether any breach of official duties occurred...
Open document →
Complaint under substantive administrative supervision (Fachaufsichtsbeschwerde): the Senate administration should examine the administrative practice concerning the video call ban
The authority exercising substantive administrative supervision (Fachaufsicht) should examine the rules, facts and proportionality considerations underlying the ban and the conclusions drawn from its being set aside by the court...
Open document →
Supplement to the Petitions Committee: request for a risk assessment covering all incidents together
Documented threats by two fellow prisoners 2024–2026 in ten points, without conclusions; request for information from the Senate Department and for an overall risk assessment outside the prison.
Open document →
The Potsdam Public Prosecutor’s Office is processing the criminal complaint: 496 Js 34084/26
The criminal complaint concerning § 223 StGB has been received and registered under a case reference. The presumption of innocence applies; I make no assessment...
Open document →
Transmission of the petition — two transmissions OK, two failed
The petition was received by the Petitions Committee at 18:17. Two other transmissions failed and are recorded separately as unsuccessful attempts...
Open document →
Constitutional complaint against the refusal of early release
Four objections alleging breaches of fundamental rights against the orders of 24.06. and 18.08.2026. Each relies on a sentence from the challenged decisions themselves...
Open document →
Petition E-208090 submitted to the German Bundestag
Via the online form because the Petitions Committee no longer has a fax connection. Requested: amendment of § 260 para. 5 StPO and clarification of the right of petition during imprisonment...
Open document →
Written declaration under responsibility for its truthfulness (Eidesstattliche Versicherung), part 2 — the witness who travelled from Bonn twice
Prof. Dr. Heinemann-Grüder demonstrated in the courtroom that we communicated practically every other day from March to May 2022. After that, the only issue was his knowledge of the proceedings...
Open document →
Written declaration under responsibility for its truthfulness (Eidesstattliche Versicherung) concerning the defendant’s final statement and the visit by Prof. Dr. Heinemann-Grüder
Signed declaration under § 156 StGB concerning three matters for which no official record is accessible: the content and interruptions of the defendant’s final statement on 22.07.2024 and the visit under LKA observation in September 2024...
Open document →
Application for the sentence plan that had been missing for eleven months
The law requires the sentence and reintegration plan within six weeks after the conviction becomes final. Eight months later, neither a plan nor a conference existed — both had to be formally requested...
Open document →
Petition to the Bundestag Petitions Committee — transmission did not take place
Signed petition concerning the video call ban of 17.07.2026 — imposed expressly in connection with a video statement addressed to the Bundestag. Transmission is forthcoming...
Open document →
Status enquiry to the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) — 48 days of silence
48 days after the constitutional complaint of 10.07.2026 was filed, there is neither an acknowledgement of receipt nor a case reference. Signed status enquiry; transmission is forthcoming...
Open document →
Supplements after handover, preservation of evidence and an application to arrange an appointment
After the delayed handover at 17:30: supplements to the court and Senate administration, two letters to the JVA requesting preservation of evidence and an urgent application for an appointment with the court registry officer (Urkundsbeamten)...
Open document →
Urgent application and supervisory complaint before handover
Five parallel fax packets to the JVA, Regional Court, Petitions Committee and Zossen Local Court (Amtsgericht Zossen) — all with “Transmission: OK”. Then an urgent application under §§ 109, 114 StVollzG and a supervisory complaint to SenJustV...
Open document →
Delayed handover of the draft appeal on points of law (Rechtsbeschwerde)
According to Deutsche Post, registered mail RT508494813DE containing the draft appeal on points of law (Rechtsbeschwerde), subject to a procedural time limit, was delivered on 19.08.2026 — but handed over only on 24.08.2026 at 17:30, opened...
Open document →
Written declaration under responsibility for its truthfulness (Eidesstattliche Erklärung) concerning the events of 13.03.2026 at Moabit prison (JVA Moabit)
On 07.08.2026, I submitted a written declaration under responsibility for its truthfulness (eidesstattliche Erklärung) concerning the events of 13 March 2026 at Moabit prison (Justizvollzugsanstalt Moabit). It fills the gap that arose because neither the diagnostic assessment v...
Open document →
Urgent application for safe continued employment and loss of earnings
On 06.08.2026, I prepared an urgent application to the management of JVA Heidering correctional facility, dated 07.08.2026.
Open document →
The “Suspended” designation, exclusion from work and transmission of the complaints
On 06.08.2026 at 08:23, the press email prepared the previous day was sent to the press office of Berlin’s justice administration, with blind copies to 50 media and human rights contacts; enclosed were A...
Open document →
Death threat, antisemitic insults and being spat at three times in work unit 3
A specific death threat by Sergej J., immediately reported to the prison management and the Potsdam Public Prosecutor’s Office (Staatsanwaltschaft Potsdam).
Open document →
Removal of both prisoners from the work unit and announced loss of work
Both prisoners removed from the work unit; concern about financial disadvantage despite my own de-escalating behaviour.
Open document →
Status enquiry, application to expedite and formal objection to delay (Verzögerungsrüge) in proceedings 595 StVK 68/26 Vollz
Formal objection to delay (Verzögerungsrüge) under § 198 para. 3 GVG because, despite the complete exchange of statements, there is still no decision on the merits.
Open document →
Response to the statement of the Prosecutor General’s Office (Generalstaatsanwaltschaft) in proceedings 2 Ws 111/26
Objection to dismissal of the immediate complaint (sofortige Beschwerde); application to set aside the order of 24.06.2026 and obtain full access to the files.
Open document →
Open statement: “I refuse freedom in exchange for a confession”
Public statement that no confession will be made to obtain early release.
Open document →
New application (workshop/pay grade) — text not yet fully verified
Handwritten application in connection with the danger posed by Pavlo S. Its wording has not yet been confirmed because of unreliable OCR.
Open document →
Written decision on the three-month blocking of video calls
Use for a political video statement is treated as “self-presentation in public” and used against the resocialisation prognosis.
Open document →
Rejection of the complaint concerning supervision of the performance of official duties (Dienstaufsichtsbeschwerde) concerning the conduct of the hearing of 24.06.2026
Another blanket rejection without disclosure of the official statement obtained.
Open document →
Statement of the Prosecutor General’s Office (Generalstaatsanwaltschaft) on the immediate complaint (sofortige Beschwerde)
The Prosecutor General’s Office (GStA) requests dismissal of the appeal as unfounded without addressing a single specifically challenged procedural fact.
Open document →
Open hypotheses — expressly not as proven facts
Bagrash formulates four hypotheses for which, according to the current state of analysis, there is no direct evidence of an instruction, agreement or consideration in return: (1) deliberate use of Pavlo S. to obtain information...
Open document →
Three-month ban on video calls — reported danger remains unaddressed
At 11:30, building manager Lohmeier (MTAL) gave Bagrash an opportunity to comment in the presence of two female social workers; video calls were banned for three months, with no legal basis identified when asked. D...
Open document →
Blocking of video calls by the prison management after publication of the video address to the Bundestag
On 17.07.2026, I was summoned to a conversation with the building manager and told that my video calls would be banned for three months — without a legal basis being identified.
Open document →
Letter to the institution’s management and conversation with Ms Mahlow
Bagrash reported to the social work service on 14.07.2026 and in writing to the management of JVA Heidering on 15.07.2026 what he saw as a specific danger to his life — by then, only around three metres apart at the workplace, sow...
Open document →
Subsequent sending of the previously missing page of the statement of the Prosecutor General’s Office (Generalstaatsanwaltschaft)
The adverse second page of the GStA statement that had been missing before the hearing (Anhörung) became known in full only 20 days after the refusal decision.
Open document →
Constitutional complaint and public dissemination
The constitutional complaint (see Chronology F2-166) is dated 10.07.2026; the accompanying press email was sent on 12.07.2026. According to Bagrash’s account, Pavlo S. was then moved to an even closer Arbe...
Open document →
Lodging the constitutional complaint with the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) and publication of the open statement
Lodging the constitutional complaint with the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) and publication of the open statement
Open document →
Delayed blanket rejection of the complaint concerning supervision of the performance of official duties (Dienstaufsichtsbeschwerde) against presiding Regional Court judge Groß (VRiLG)
After almost ten months: no indications of conduct relevant under the rules governing supervision of the performance of official duties, without examination of the individual facts.
Open document →
Expanded submission to the State Office for Immigration (Landesamt für Einwanderung) after access to the file and presentation of the expert report
Expanded submission to the State Office for Immigration (Landesamt für Einwanderung) after access to the file and presentation of the expert report
Open document →
Scientific and practical expert report on the individual risk prognosis in the event of expulsion (Ausweisung) or transfer to the…
Scientific and practical expert report on the individual risk prognosis in the event of expulsion (Ausweisung) or transfer under Russian sovereign authority
Open document →
Immediate complaint (sofortige Beschwerde) against the order of 24.06.2026, Open Statement and proof of fax transmission
Immediate complaint (sofortige Beschwerde) against the order of 24.06.2026, Open Statement and proof of fax transmission
Open document →
Statement following the hearing of 24.06.2026 in proceedings 589 StVK 86/26 and Open Statement following refusal to suspend the remainder of the sentence on probation
Statement following the hearing of 24.06.2026 in proceedings 589 StVK 86/26 and Open Statement following refusal to suspend the remainder of the sentence on probation
Open document →
Complaint concerning supervision of the performance of official duties (Dienstaufsichtsbeschwerde) to the president of Berlin Regional Court I (Landgericht Berlin I) concerning the conduct of the hearing on 24.06.2026 and another reminder concerning…
Complaint concerning supervision of the performance of official duties (Dienstaufsichtsbeschwerde) to the President of the Berlin Regional Court I (Landgericht Berlin I) concerning the conduct of the hearing of 24.06.2026 and a renewed reminder of earlier unanswered complaints concerning supervision of the performance of official duties
Open document →
Order of the Berlin Regional Court I (Landgericht Berlin I) refusing to suspend the remainder of the sentence on probation
On 01.07.2026, I received the order of Berlin Regional Court I (Landgericht Berlin I), chamber for matters concerning execution of sentences, of 24.06.2026 in proceedings 589 StVK 86/26. By this order, suspension of execution of the remaining Fr...
Open document →
Late receipt of the statement of Heidering prison (JVA Heidering) of 07.05.2026 in proceedings 589 StVK 86/26
Late receipt of the statement of Heidering prison (JVA Heidering) of 07.05.2026 in proceedings 589 StVK 86/26
Open document →
Incomplete transmission of the Prosecutor General’s Office (Generalstaatsanwaltschaft) documents before the two-thirds review and a renewed complaint of violation of the right to be heard
Incomplete transmission of the Prosecutor General’s Office (Generalstaatsanwaltschaft) documents before the two-thirds review and a renewed complaint of violation of the right to be heard
Open document →
Final statement and public documentation opposing the reinterpretation of seeking legal protection as dangerousness
Final statement and public documentation opposing the reinterpretation of seeking legal protection as dangerousness
Open document →
Receipt of the letter of the Berlin Regional Court I (Landgericht Berlin I) of 01.06.2026 and the statement of Moabit prison (JVA Moabit) of 28.05.2026 in proceedings 595 StVK 68/26 Vollz
Receipt of the letter of the Berlin Regional Court I (Landgericht Berlin I) of 01.06.2026 and the statement of Moabit prison (JVA Moabit) of 28.05.2026 in proceedings 595 StVK 68/26 Vollz
Open document →
Order of the Berlin Higher Regional Court (Kammergericht) in proceedings 5 Ws 17/26 on the appeal on points of law (Rechtsbeschwerde) concerning access to the registry official
Order of the Berlin Higher Regional Court (Kammergericht) in proceedings 5 Ws 17/26 on the appeal on points of law (Rechtsbeschwerde) concerning access to the registry official
Open document →
Letter to the Landgericht Berlin (Berlin Regional Court)
Application for access to the file, application for press admission, public documentation
Open document →
Public statement before the two-thirds hearing
On 10.06.2026, I wrote a public statement (Open Statement) recorded as Annex 126_F2. This document was sent to Landgericht Berlin I as well as editorial offices and members of the Bundestag un...
Open document →
Transfer to work unit 2 at JVA Heidering correctional facility — renewed proximity to Pavlo S.
After working without objection in work unit 3 since August 2025, Bagrash was unexpectedly transferred to work unit 2, where Pavlo S. worked only a few metres away. An open statement of 11.06.2026 documented the V...
Open document →
Summons to the two-thirds hearing under § 57 StGB
On 04.06.2026, Berlin Regional Court I (Landgericht Berlin I), chamber for matters concerning execution of sentences, issued a summons in proceedings 589 StVK 86/26 to an oral hearing on suspension of the remainder of the sentence on probation under § 57 StGB. La...
Open document →
Receipt of the Landgericht Berlin I (Berlin Regional Court I) order of 18.05.2026 in case 595 StVK 68/26 Vollz
Receipt of the Landgericht Berlin I (Berlin Regional Court I) order of 18.05.2026 in case 595 StVK 68/26 Vollz
Open document →
Receipt of the observations / request for an extension of time from JVA Moabit (Moabit prison) of 12.05.2026
On 27.05.2026, I received the letter of JVA Moabit of 12.05.2026 in proceedings 595 StVK 68/26 Vollz. In it, JVA Moabit requests an extension from Landgericht Berlin I for processing the ge...
Open document →
Communication from the Berlin Higher Regional Court (Kammergericht) concerning the appeal on points of law (Rechtsbeschwerde) in proceedings 5 Ws 17/26
On 01.06.2026, I received the letter of the Kammergericht of 27.05.2026. It informed me that my appeal on points of law (Rechtsbeschwerde), recorded on 13.01.2026, against the order of Landgericht Berlin I of 10.12.2...
Open document →
Reply from the President of the Kammergericht (Berlin Higher Regional Court) to my submissions of 30.03.2026 and 18.04.2026
Reply from the President of the Kammergericht (Berlin Higher Regional Court) to my submissions of 30.03.2026 and 18.04.2026
Open document →
Observations submitted within the time limit to the Landesamt für Einwanderung (State Office for Immigration) opposing the intended expulsion
Observations submitted within the time limit to the Landesamt für Einwanderung (State Office for Immigration) opposing the intended expulsion
Open document →
Application for a judicial decision and application for interim judicial protection against the sentence enforcement and reintegration plan
Application for a judicial decision and application for interim judicial protection against the sentence enforcement and reintegration plan
Open document →
Receipt of the Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court) order declining to accept the complaint without reasons (Nichtannahmebeschluss)
On 28.04.2026, I received the order of the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) of 13.04.2026 concerning my constitutional complaint against the order of the Kammergericht Berlin of 31.10.2025 — 3 Ws 48/25, 3 Ws 49/25 — and against ...
Open document →
Immigration-law deportation warning from the Landesamt für Einwanderung (State Office for Immigration) shortly after the sentence and integration plan
/ Received 30.04.2026 — notice threatening deportation under immigration law from the State Office for Immigration (Landesamt für Einwanderung) shortly after the sentence and reintegration plan
Open document →
Receipt of the sentence enforcement and reintegration plan of JVA Moabit
On 24.04.2026, I received a copy of the sentence and reintegration plan of JVA Moabit for the first time. The document is dated 17.04.2026 but, according to its own contents, is based on the diagnostic assessment of...
Open document →
Acknowledgement of receipt from the Petitions Committee of the Abgeordnetenhaus von Berlin (Berlin House of Representatives)
Received after 20.04.2026 — acknowledgement of receipt from the Petitions Committee of the Berlin House of Representatives (Abgeordnetenhaus von Berlin).
Open document →
Renewed fax transmission and reminder after the 72-hour time limit expired without result
Renewed fax transmission and reminder after the 72-hour time limit expired without result to
Open document →
Receipt of the only response from the Landgericht Berlin
On 20.04.2026, I received the only written reply so far from Landgericht Berlin I to my repeated status enquiries and letters escalating the matter concerning the appeal on points of law (Rechtsbeschwerde) of 13.01.2026 against the order of the Land...
Open document →
Renewed parliamentary submissions to the Abgeordnetenhaus von Berlin after a failed fax attempt
Renewed parliamentary submissions to the Abgeordnetenhaus von Berlin after a failed fax attempt
Open document →
Final escalation because transmission of my appeal on points of law (Rechtsbeschwerde) remains unverified
On 30.03.2026, after receiving no substantive and verifiable response to my letters of 02.03.2026, I initiated a final escalation because my appeal on points of law (Rechtsbeschwerde), lodged on the record at AG Zossen on 13.01.2026, was still neither evidenced by a case reference at the Kammergericht nor shown to me to have been properly transmitted.
Open document →
Escalation letter to the President of the Landgericht Berlin I concerning the lack of a substantive response to my complaints
Escalation letter to the President of the Landgericht Berlin I concerning the lack of a substantive response to my complaints
Open document →
First summons to the EWA Commission at JVA Moabit after more than three years in custody
oral refusal of a transfer to an open prison regime because of the absence of an admission of guilt
Open document →
Status enquiry and formal objection to delay (Verzögerungsrüge) to Berlin Regional Court I (Landgericht Berlin I)
Fax to the 99th chamber for matters concerning execution of sentences: seven weeks after my appeal on points of law (Rechtsbeschwerde) was recorded at AG Zossen, no acknowledgement of receipt and no transmission date — also a formal objection to delay (Verzögerungsrüge) under § 198 para. 3 GVG.
Open document →
Precautionary transmission to the Kammergericht Berlin because of possible non-submission by the Landgericht Berlin I
Precautionary transmission to the Kammergericht Berlin because of possible non-submission by the Landgericht Berlin I
Open document →
Lodging an appeal on points of law (Rechtsbeschwerde) under § 116 StVollzG
On 13.01.2026, I lodged an appeal on points of law (Rechtsbeschwerde) on the record at the registry of Zossen Local Court (Amtsgericht Zossen) against the order of Berlin Regional Court (Landgericht Berlin) of 10.12.2025 (case reference 599 StVK 215/25 Vollz) and simultaneously applied for ...
Open document →
Request for information on the status of the constitutional complaint of 24.11.2025
On 27.12.2025, I sent a status enquiry to the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) concerning my constitutional complaint filed on 24.11.2025 (KG Berlin, order of 31.10.2025, 3 Ws 48/25 + 49/25). I pointed to the Zu...
Open document →
Order of LG Berlin received (99th chamber for matters concerning execution of sentences, StVK): objection alleging a breach of the right to be heard (Gehörsrüge) dismissed
Case reference 599 StVK 215/25 Vollz (of 10.12.2025): dismissal of my objection alleging a breach of the right to be heard (Gehörsrüge) against the order of 04.11.2025 (§ 114 para. 2 StVollzG).
Open document →
Order of LG Berlin received (99th chamber for matters concerning execution of sentences, StVK): applications under § 109 dismissed
Case reference 599 StVK 215/25 Vollz (of 10.12.2025): dismissal of my applications under § 109 (escorted visit (Ausführung)/court registry officer (Urkundsbeamter)) and fixing of the value of the matter.
Open document →
Filing my constitutional complaint
On 24.11.2025 I lodged a constitutional complaint with the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) against the order of the Berlin Higher Regional Court (Kammergericht Berlin) of 31.10.2025 (3 Ws 48/25 + 49/25), served on me on 07.11.2025.
Open document →
Comprehensive response to LG Berlin concerning the JVA Heidering statements
On 24.11.2025, I submitted a detailed reply to Landgericht Berlin (case reference 599 StVK 215/25 Vollz) concerning the statements of JVA Heidering (MTAL 1 — AR1024 and letter of 07.11.2025). In it, I objected to ...
Open document →
Receipt of the letter of 13.11.2025 / statement of Heidering correctional facility (JVA Heidering)
On 18.11.2025, I received for information the letter of Landgericht Berlin of 13.11.2025, requesting a statement within two weeks. Its subject was the statement of JVA Heidering of 0...
Open document →
Receipt of the statement of Heidering correctional facility (JVA Heidering)
On 10.11.2025, I received the statement of JVA Heidering for the first time, forwarded through Landgericht Berlin. This made it evident that the Heidering prison management unlawfully the court’s tasks übernomm...
Open document →
Rejection of my application by the chamber for matters concerning execution of sentences (Strafvollstreckungskammer)
The chamber for matters concerning execution of sentences at LG Berlin dismissed my application of 11.06.2025 (UKB access + interim order) in full. Reasoning: according to JVA Heidering, I already had on 27.05., 28.05. and 06.06. Zug...
Open document →
The Berlin Higher Regional Court (Kammergericht) again refuses substantive examination and completely ignores procedural errors
The Berlin Higher Regional Court (Kammergericht) again refuses substantive examination and completely ignores procedural errors
Open document →
Written declaration under responsibility for its truthfulness (Eidesstattliche Erklärung) (failure to provide medical care + threat/suspicion of provocation) sent to media/justice administration
Written declaration under responsibility for its truthfulness (Eidesstattliche Erklärung) (failure to provide medical care + threat/suspicion of provocation) sent to media/justice administration
Open document →
Earlier documented report of danger concerning Pavlo S. at JVA Heidering correctional facility
In my written declaration under responsibility for its truthfulness (eidesstattliche Erklärung) of 27.10.2025 (Annex 81_F2), I recorded that Pavlo S. appeared in workshop 3 of JVA Heidering in mid-October 2025 and there — after I had expressed criticism of d...
Open document →
Dispatch to Berlin Regional Court (LG Berlin, StVK), case reference 599 StVK 215/25 Vollz.
Objection to “setting aside without a formal procedure” (§ 109 StVollzG; alternative application under § 114 StVollzG). Reference: LG letter of 06.10.2025 (received 08.10.2025) — Annex 79_F2.
Open document →
European Court of Human Rights (EGMR) application and request under Rule 39
On 13.10.2025, a set of European Court of Human Rights (EGMR) application documents relating to case 1 was prepared or lodged, including the application form, supplementary sections E and F and a request under Rule 39.
Open document →
Two statements from pre-trial detention: an allegation of eavesdropping and a Skype request
Published only now: the allegation of eavesdropping against Senior Prosecutor (OStA) Wachs and an application for Skype contact with the family, both on the record of the court registry officer (Urkundsbeamten) at JVA Moabit...
Open document →
Sending the complaints to the EGMR (European Court of Human Rights; EGMR, Council of Europe, F-67075 Strasbourg-Cedex, France)
Sending the complaints to the EGMR (European Court of Human Rights; EGMR, Council of Europe, F-67075 Strasbourg-Cedex, France)
Open document →
Receipt of a statement from Berlin I Regional Court (LG Berlin I; Judge Dr Busse-Muskala):
On 08.10.2025, I received the letter of Landgericht Berlin of 06.10.2025, expressly referring to the statement of JVA Heidering of 26.09.2025. The court stated that the Stellungn...
Open document →
Immediate complaint (sofortige Beschwerde) — application for forwarding to the Kammergericht (Higher Regional Court)
On 06.10.2025, I submitted a formal application to the Kammergericht Berlin (criminal division, Strafsenat) for my immediate complaint (sofortige Beschwerde) of 26./27.08.2025 against the correction order of LG Berlin of 30.07.2025 to be transmitted under § 306 A...
Open document →
Letter from the registry of LG Berlin (Berlin Regional Court): reply to a status inquiry
On 30.09.2025, I received a letter from the registry of Landgericht Berlin (court registry officer (Urkundsbeamtin) Schlägel, dated 23.09.2025). Content: my status enquiry of 17.09.2025 together with the formal objection to delay concerns...
Open document →
Written declaration under responsibility for its truthfulness (eidesstattliche Erklärung) “Deception 5”
In September 2025, I submitted a written declaration under responsibility for its truthfulness (eidesstattliche Erklärung; “Deception 5”). Content: despite my efforts in December 2024 to discharge my court-appointed defence lawyer Römer and a new defence lawyer with Aktenein...
Open document →
Status enquiry requesting acknowledgement of receipt under § 37 and transmission of the appeal under § 306 para. 2 StPO
To the 22nd major criminal chamber, with transmission evidence (RR98 2267 909DE), concerning the appeal of 26./27.08.2025.
Open document →
Formal objection to delay (Verzögerungsrüge) under § 198 para. 3 GVG because of inaction
Copy to the president of Landgericht Berlin and to the Kammergericht (criminal division, Strafsenat).
Open document →
Application under § 109 StVollzG (no decision on the UKB application v
11.06.2025) sent to LG Berlin — chamber for matters concerning execution of sentences; alternatively, an interim order (EA) under § 114 StVollzG.
Open document →
Decisions on two constitutional complaints
On 11.09.2025 I received the decisions of 01.09.2025 on my two constitutional complaints of 16.06.2025 (in an opened envelope).
Open document →
Open letter to the Senator for Justice (also to the media)
On 09.09.2025, I emailed an open letter to Berlin’s senator for justice (cc: state secretariat/press office); the identical text was sent to the press mailing list at the same time. Content: current Justiz...
Open document →
Complaint under substantive administrative supervision (Fachaufsichtsbeschwerde) to the Berlin Senate Department for Justice
On 06.09.2025, I filed a complaint under substantive administrative supervision (Fachaufsichtsbeschwerde) with Berlin’s Senate administration for justice. Content: inadmissible order of LG Berlin of 30.07.2025 without information on legal remedies, judgment of 22.07.2024...
Open document →
Complaint concerning supervision of the performance of official duties (Dienstaufsichtsbeschwerde) to the President of Berlin Regional Court (LG Berlin)
On 05.09.2025, I filed a complaint concerning supervision of the performance of official duties (Dienstaufsichtsbeschwerde) with the president of Landgericht Berlin (Littenstraße 12–17). Subject: the order of 30.07.2025 without information on legal remedies, the inadmissible Ten...
Open document →
Decisions of the Federal Constitutional Court
According to the later EGMR materials, the latest domestic decisions identified are the orders of the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) of 01.09.2025 refusing to accept the complaints for consideration, served on 11.09.2025, under case references 2 BvR 9...
Open document →
Submission of a cascade of complaints to Berlin Regional Court (LG Berlin)
Submission within the time limit to the 22nd large criminal chamber — Schwurgericht (chamber for serious crimes) — against the order of 30.07.2025 (“rectification”/first inclusion of the list of provisions):
Open document →
Further supplement to the constitutional complaint
On 19.08.2025, a further supplement to the constitutional complaint was lodged.
Open document →
Constitutional complaint: supplement concerning the missing list of provisions
Supplement to the pending constitutional complaint, in particular concerning the missing list of provisions in the judgment and the complete absence of information on legal remedies ha...
Open document →
Contact with Sergej J. in work unit 3
Another fellow prisoner conspicuously seeks proximity and asks about an alleged FSB contact — contact later broken off.
Open document →
Order of Berlin Regional Court (LG Berlin) of 30.07.2025
On 07.08.2025, I received the order of Landgericht Berlin of 30.07.2025, by which the judgment of 22.07.2024 was retrospectively “corrected” and supplemented with the list of criminal provisions applied.
Open document →
Transmission of a certified copy of the rectification order
By letter of 05.08.2025, the Berlin Regional Court I sent the certified copy of the order of 30.07.2025.
Open document →
Sending a reasoned complaint to the Senate Department by email
On 05.08.2025, I sent by email a reasoned complaint entitled
Open document →
Start of an indefinite hunger strike over denial of access to justice and inaction by the Senate Department for Justice
Start of an indefinite hunger strike over denial of access to justice and inaction by the Senate Department for Justice
Open document →
Letter handed over after the start of the hunger strike
On 04.08.2025, after my hunger strike began, the previously withheld and opened letter containing drafts of an application to the European Court of Human Rights (EGMR) was handed over to me late, in the afternoon. There is a risk of recurrence.
Open document →
Arbitrary “acknowledgement of receipt” of my complaint of 25.07.2025 (see point 100)
Arbitrary “acknowledgement of receipt” of my complaint of 25.07.2025 (see point 100)
Open document →
Renewed violation of the secrecy of correspondence by Heidering Prison (JVA Heidering)
On 01.08.2025 at 19:23 the wing officer, Mr Mattusch (name heard), refused to hand over a letter that had already been opened and contained important documents for my complaint to the EGMR (European Court of Human Rights) and a media article ...
Open document →
Berlin Regional Court (Landgericht Berlin) rectification order concerning the list of provisions applied
Berlin Regional Court (Landgericht Berlin) rectification order concerning the list of provisions applied
Open document →
Constitutional complaint: supplement concerning the BGH order of 19.06.2025
A further supplement to the constitutional complaint concerning the BGH order of 19.06.2025.
Open document →
Constitutional complaint: supplement challenging BGH order 5 StR 72/25
Supplement to the constitutional complaint (Az. 2 BvR 964/25 and 2 BvR 1069/25) challenging the BGH order of 19.06.2025 concerning hearing-violation complaints (Anhörungsrügen; Az. 5 StR 72/25).
Open document →
Complaint concerning inactivity by the Senate Department and announcement of international steps
Complaint concerning inactivity by the Senate Department and announcement of international steps
Open document →
Constitutional complaint: supplement of 23.07.2025
A supplement to the constitutional complaint was submitted.
Open document →
Supplement to the constitutional complaint of 18.06.2025
On 23.07.2025 I submitted a supplement to my constitutional complaint of 18.06.2025 against the order of the 5th Criminal Division (Strafsenat) of the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) of 07.05.2025 (Az.: 5 StR 72/25). Because of an undecided Sof...
Open document →
Submission of further documents for three constitutional complaints
Az. 2 BvR 964/25, AR 4078/25 and AR 4152/25 at the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht).
Open document →
Blanket response to all my complaints alleging a violation of the right to be heard (Anhörungsrügen)
On 17.07.2025 I received the order of the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) of 19.06.2025 as a blanket response to all my hearing-violation complaints (Anhörungsrügen). Again, not a single word about the facts raised. (See...
Open document →
Berlin Prosecutor General’s Office (Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Berlin)
On 15.07.2025 I received a reply from the Berlin Prosecutor General’s Office (Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Berlin) dated 01.07.2025. In the letter, Leading Senior Public Prosecutor (Leitender Oberstaatsanwalt) Dr. Brocke states that he found no procedural violations. Regarding that...
Open document →
Application for an interim order under § 32 BVerfGG
On 30.06.2025 I send by post to the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) an application for an interim order under § 32 BVerfGG. The application contains documentation of the blockade of access to justice and all wes...
Open document →
Application for restoration of the previous procedural position (Wiedereinsetzung in den vorigen Stand) under § 93 Abs. 2 Satz 2 BVerfGG
Alternative application to the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) because of documented DHL delivery problems: the constitutional complaint sent within the time limit on 16.06.2025 did not arrive.
Open document →
Urgent application for additional electronic delivery (email)
On 24.06.2025 I make an express and polite request to the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) for additional electronic service (E-Mail) of all letters. Because of considerable difficulties and wie...
Open document →
Filing a criminal complaint against JVA Heidering concerning Rechtsbeugung (perversion of justice), coercion and obstruction of criminal prosecution in public office
Filing a criminal complaint against JVA Heidering concerning Rechtsbeugung (perversion of justice), coercion and obstruction of criminal prosecution in public office
Open document →
Email complaint to the Berlin Senate Department for Justice (Senatsverwaltung für Justiz Berlin)
On 20.06.2025 I submitted a formal complaint by email to the Berlin Senate Department for Justice (Senatsverwaltung für Justiz Berlin; pressestelle@senjustv.berlin.de and post@senjustv.berlin.de). In it I documented the unlawful Verw...
Open document →
Federal Court of Justice (BGH) order on complaints alleging a violation of the right to be heard
On 19.06.2025, a further order of the Federal Court of Justice was issued in connection with complaints alleging a violation of the right to be heard (Anhörungsrügen). The document is filed in the case 1 folder as a separate BGH order.
Open document →
Emergency submission of both my constitutional complaints
Between 19.06.2025 and 20.06.2025 I lodged both constitutional complaints as an emergency measure, each including an application for an interim order, within the time limit by fax with the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) — ein...
Open document →
Constitutional complaint against the order of the 5th Criminal Division (Strafsenat)
On 16.06.2025 a constitutional complaint was lodged against the order of the 5th Criminal Division (Strafsenat) of the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) of 07.05.2025. It particularly concerned what I considered the absence of a substantive examination of Revisio...
Open document →
Constitutional complaint against the presiding judge’s order
Also on 16.06.2025 a constitutional complaint was lodged against the order of the presiding judge of the 5th Criminal Division (Strafsenat) of 07.05.2025. It particularly concerned the refusal to discharge counsel RA Römer from the appointment, the Abl...
Open document →
Sending two constitutional complaints to the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht)
On 16.06.2025 I sent two constitutional complaints within the time limit via Deutsche Post to the Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court), Schlossbezirk 3, 76131 Karlsruhe.
Open document →
Cancellation by Heidering correctional facility (JVA Heidering) of attendance before the authorised registry official
On the afternoon of 13.06.2025 the group supervisor, Ms Dahms, personally informed me that JVA Heidering had cancelled my escorted attendance before the registry officer who records procedural declarations (Urkundsbeamten). The reason given was an alleged Fristvers...
Open document →
Urgent request for a ballpoint pen to group supervisor Dahms
On 13.06.2025 I urgently asked the group supervisor, Ms Dahms, for a ballpoint pen so I could immediately draft applications to the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) and the EGMR (European Court of Human Rights). She refused, stating that such Ar...
Open document →
Written application to the facility management
On 11.06.2025 at 08:20 I made a written request to the management of JVA Heidering concerning the matter I had previously explained orally (see point 83), in particular requesting prompt Organisat...
Open document →
Sudden transfer to Heidering correctional facility (JVA Heidering)
On 10.06.2025 I was unexpectedly transferred to Heidering correctional facility (JVA Heidering).
Open document →
Immediate application for an appointment with the authorised registry official after arrival at Heidering correctional facility (JVA Heidering)
Immediately after arriving at JVA Heidering on 10.06.2025 I made an express oral request to the responsible group supervisor, Ms Dahms, for a prompt appointment with the court registry officer (Urkundsbeamten) — ermö...
Open document →
Continued accommodation in the same unit
According to Bagrash’s account, Pavlo S. remained in the same unit for around nine months and at times worked handing out food. Bagrash largely stayed in his cell out of concern about further conflicts. These An...
Open document →
Opened A4 letter after threat of a hunger strike
On 30.05.2025 I received an A4 letter (tracking number RR 7463 7782 1DE112) that had already been sent on 26.05.2025. The letter was handed over only after I announced a hunger strike, in an opened...
Open document →
Letter subject to a deadline still being withheld
On 30.05.2025 I learned that another letter addressed to me involving a time limit had been sent (tracking number: RR 8622 3555 5DE). It has not been handed over to me to this day, neither opened no...
Open document →
Application for a stay of enforcement
On 28.05.2025 an application to stay execution was made. According to the list of annexes, the full version reached the BGH on 29.05.2025; also a shortened version — for the registry record ge...
Open document →
Abbreviated complaint alleging a violation of the right to be heard (Anhörungsrüge) concerning the presiding judge’s order
On 28.05.2025, an abbreviated complaint alleging a violation of the right to be heard (Anhörungsrüge) concerning the presiding judge’s order was also entered on the record.
Open document →
Last day to submit the complaints alleging a violation of the right to be heard (Anhörungsrügen)
On 28.05.2025 at 08:30, I was again brought before the registry official (Urkundsbeamter). Two documents were entered on the record:
Open document →
Application for a stay of enforcement sent to the BGH by post
On 28.05.2025 I additionally sent the complete application to stay execution bearing my original signature by post to the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof). (Annex 46_F2) Postal delivery on 30.05.2025 (R...
Open document →
Complete complaint alleging a violation of the right to be heard (Anhörungsrüge), submitted for the record
On 27.05.2025, the complaint alleging a violation of the right to be heard (Anhörungsrüge) concerning the order of the 5th Criminal Division (Strafsenat) was entered on the record in full.
Open document →
First hearing-violation complaint (Anhörungsrüge) recorded by the registry officer (UKB) (hearing-violation complaint under § 356a StPO against the order of the 5.
First hearing-violation complaint (Anhörungsrüge) recorded by the registry officer (UKB) (hearing-violation complaint under § 356a StPO against the order of the 5th Criminal Division (Strafsenat) of the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) of 07.05.2025)
Open document →
Complaints alleging a violation of the right to be heard, application for acceptance and written declaration under responsibility for its truthfulness (eidesstattliche Erklärung)
On 26.05.2025 several hearing-violation complaints (Anhörungsrügen), an application for their acceptance and a written declaration under responsibility for its truthfulness (eidesstattliche Erklärung) were prepared and/or submitted. The list of annexes names, in particular, complaints against the BGH-Beschl...
Open document →
Refusal by the registry clerk to record my complaints alleging a violation of the right to be heard
At 06:20, I applied to have three complaints alleging a violation of the right to be heard (Anhörungsrügen) entered on the record at the registry of Moabit Prison (JVA Moabit), pointing out that a time limit applied (one week).
Open document →
Fallback written submission of three complaints alleging a violation of the right to be heard to the BGH
I then submitted, in the alternative, three written hearing-violation complaints (Anhörungsrügen) under § 356a StPO i.V.m. § 44 StPO to the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof), together with a complaint about the inaction of the court registry officer (Urkundsbeamtin). The postal Z...
Open document →
Sending approximately 50 emails
At around 15:00 I sent approximately 50 emails with the subject “Acceptance/rejection”, including to the Senate Department for Justice (Senatsverwaltung für Justiz), the Bundestag, the Federal Ministry of Justice (Bundesjustizministerium) and various media outlets, referring to the Drin...
Open document →
Time-limited matter: dispatch of the complaints alleging a violation of the right to be heard despite postal delay
On 26.05.2025, important documents were supposed to be delivered to me for preparing my written complaints alleging a violation of the right to be heard (Anhörungsrügen) to the Federal Court of Justice. The matter was subject to a time limit.
Open document →
Tampered letter from the Senate Department for Justice
On 26.05.2025 at 13:10 I received a letter from the Senate Department for Justice (Senatsverwaltung für Justiz) dated 16.05.2025. The envelope appeared closed from the outside but bore clear traces of previous opening and na...
Open document →
Complaint alleging a violation of the right to be heard (Anhörungsrüge) against the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) order
On 22.05.2025, a complaint alleging a violation of the right to be heard (Anhörungsrüge) against the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) order was prepared or documented with an original signature.
Open document →
Service of the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) orders
According to the lists of annexes, the Federal Court of Justice (BGH) decisions of 07.05.2025 were served on 21.05.2025.
Open document →
Receipt of two orders of the BGH (Federal Court of Justice) of 07.05.2025
On 21.05.2025 I received two orders of the Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court of Justice) of 07.05.2025:
Open document →
Ending my hunger strike
I ended my hunger strike with the following provisional result:
The postal blockade appears to have been broken. Between 05.05.2025 and 20.05.2025 my supplements to the appeal on points of law (Revision), Parts 3 to 8, and m...
Open document →
Supplement to the grounds for the appeal on points of law (Revision), part 8, for the record
On 20.05.2025 the supplement to the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision), Part 8, was entered in the record.
Open document →
Acknowledgement of receipt from the Petitions Committee (Petitionsausschuss; Az. PET 4-21-07-99999-001649)
An acknowledgement of receipt was received from the Petitions Committee of the German Bundestag (Petitionsausschuss des Deutschen Bundestages). For the first time it was delivered properly and in a sealed envelope in accordance with §...
Open document →
Submission of the eighth supplement to the grounds for the appeal on points of law at Amtsgericht Tiergarten (Tiergarten Local Court)
Also on 20.05.2025 I submitted the eighth supplement to the grounds of my appeal on points of law (Revision) to the registry office recording procedural declarations (Urkundsbeamtenstelle) at Tiergarten Local Court (Amtsgericht Tiergarten).
Open document →
Receipt of letters
On 19.05.2025, for the first time, I received two letters from acquaintances with legally valid delivery, each in a sealed envelope.
Open document →
Visit by court-appointed defence counsel
On 15.05.2025 between 14:30 and 15:30 I was visited by my long-absent court-appointed defence counsel, R., whom I had not seen for several months.
Open document →
Supplements to the grounds for the appeal on points of law (Revision), parts 5 to 7 and coronavirus aid, for the record
On 14.05.2025 the supplements to the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision), Parts 5, 6 and 7, and the “Coronavirus assistance” (Coronahilfe) supplement were entered in the record.
Open document →
Submission of the fifth to seventh supplements and the coronavirus emergency-assistance supplement to the grounds for the appeal on points of law through Amtsgericht Tiergarten (Tiergarten Local Court)
Submission of the fifth to seventh supplements and the coronavirus emergency-assistance supplement to the grounds for the appeal on points of law through Amtsgericht Tiergarten (Tiergarten Local Court)
Open document →
Medical examination in connection with the hunger strike
On 14.05.2025 I underwent a medical examination in connection with my hunger strike, which I had begun on 05.05.2025.
Open document →
Letter from the Senate Department for Justice (of 05.05.2025)
On 14.05.2025 at 12:25 I received a letter from the Senate Department for Justice (Senatsverwaltung für Justiz), dated 05.05.2025. As has now become customary, the letter did not reach me in its original envelope. This bedeut...
Open document →
Formal petition submitted
A formal petition was submitted against the targeted and systematic deprivation of my rights, isolation and wearing me down by German judicial and prison authorities. (Annex 3...
Open document →
Birthday greeting à la Dr. Felor Badenberg
On 09.05.2025 between 09:45 and 10:30 I was “greeted” with a cell inspection instead of flowers. Three justice officials carried out a thorough search on instructions “from the very top” m...
Open document →
Supplement to the grounds for the appeal on points of law (Revision), part 4, for the record
On 07.05.2025 Part 4 of the supplement to the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision) was entered in the record.
Open document →
Order of the 5th Criminal Division (Strafsenat) of the Federal Court of Justice
On 07.05.2025 the 5th Criminal Division (Strafsenat) of the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) issued its order in proceedings 5 StR 72/25. According to the constitutional complaint, the appeal on points of law (Revision), without substantive consideration of the author’s own complaints, was verwor...
Open document →
Order of the presiding judge of the 5th Criminal Division (Strafsenat)
Also on 07.05.2025 the presiding judge of the 5th Criminal Division (Strafsenat) decided on the application to discharge counsel RA Römer from the appointment and on access to the case file. The application to revoke the appointment of defence counsel was rejected; di...
Open document →
Submission of the fourth supplement to the grounds of appeal on points of law through Tiergarten Local Court (UKB)
Submission of the fourth supplement to the grounds of appeal on points of law through Tiergarten Local Court (UKB)
Open document →
Supplement to the grounds for the appeal on points of law (Revision), part 3, for the record
On 05.05.2025 Part 3 of the supplement to the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision) was entered in the record.
Open document →
Hunger strike
On 05.05.2025, I announced a hunger strike — for my fundamental rights, for the rule of law and for human dignity, relying on the announcements of the Federal President and the media.
Open document →
Start of my hunger strike
On 05.05.2025 at 06:25 I began a hunger strike in protest after, for weeks, through targeted cooperation between various justice bodies, namely the prison, the Urkundsbea...
Open document →
Submission of the third supplement to the grounds of appeal on points of law through Tiergarten Local Court (UKB)
Submission of the third supplement to the grounds of appeal on points of law through Tiergarten Local Court (UKB)
Open document →
Refusal by the registry official to accept my criminal complaint
On 05.05.2025 the responsible court registry officer (Urkundsbeamte) at Tiergarten Local Court (Amtsgericht Tiergarten) refused to accept my criminal complaint about systematic breaches of the confidentiality of correspondence by the management of JVA Moabit (see P...
Open document →
I applied to the registry official at Moabit Prison (JVA Moabit)
On 02.05.2025 at 6:20 I submitted to the registry officer (Urkundsbeamte) at JVA Moabit a request for an urgent appointment with a registry officer in order to make a criminal complaint under § 206 StGB against Moabit Prison (Justizvollzugsanstalt Moabit) — erstatt...
Open document →
Receipt of a letter in a replaced envelope
On 29.04.2025 at 12:15 I received, for the first time, a letter from the Senate Department for Justice (Senatsverwaltung für Justiz) in an apparently sealed envelope. However, the outer surface of the envelope was blank, without postage and...
Open document →
Renewed formal complaint against Moabit Prison (Justizvollzugsanstalt Moabit)
On 24.04.2025 I again submit a formal complaint against Moabit Prison (Justizvollzugsanstalt Moabit) to the Berlin Senate Department for Justice and Consumer Protection (Senatsverwaltung für Justiz Berlin und Verbraucherschutz). In it I expressly request an independent...
Open document →
Personal appeal to Berlin’s Senator for Justice, Dr. Felor Badenberg
Also on 24.04.2025 I make a personal appeal to Berlin’s Senator for Justice, Dr. Felor Badenberg. In it I urgently ask her personally to take responsibility for clarifying my case — zu...
Open document →
Opened mail from Tiergarten Local Court (Amtsgericht Tiergarten)
Two letters were received already opened, one from Tiergarten Local Court (Amtsgericht Tiergarten), which should in fact not be subject to mail inspection.
Open document →
Complaint seeking substantive administrative supervision (Fachaufsichtsbeschwerde) to the President of the Berlin Higher Regional Court (Kammergericht Berlin) concerning systematic violations of the law by the Local Court registry…
Complaint under substantive administrative supervision (Fachaufsichtsbeschwerde) to the President of the Berlin Higher Regional Court (Kammergericht) concerning systematic violations of law by the registry of Tiergarten Local Court
Open document →
Berlin Senate Department for Justice and Consumer Protection
On 17.04.2025 at 12:24 I received a letter from the Berlin Senate Department for Justice and Consumer Protection (Senatsverwaltung für Justiz Berlin und Verbraucherschutz) in response to my complaint letter of 26.03.2025. The letter, already opened, was aus... to me
Open document →
Application for provisional acceptance of supplements, parts 5 to 7
On 07.04.2025 I applied to the BGH for provisional acceptance of the supplements to the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision), Parts 5 to 7, because of repeated refusals to accept them. According to the list of annexes, these supplements on 09.04.2025 ...
Open document →
Application to the BGH for a judicial decision concerning inaction under § 198 GVG
Application to the BGH for a judicial decision concerning inaction under § 198 GVG. I apply for a judicial decision concerning inaction under § 198 GVG. This is directed against the inaction of the Bund...
Open document →
Application to the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) for provisional acceptance of supplements to the appeal on points of law (Revision), Parts 5–7
Repeated refusals of acceptance by the BGH; application for provisional consideration of the supplements to the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision), Parts 5, 6 and 7.
Open document →
Opened mail from defence counsel; documents relevant to the appeal on points of law (Revision) missing
A letter from defence counsel arrived opened; documents relevant to the appeal on points of law (Revision) were still missing.
Open document →
Complaint seeking supervision of the performance of official duties (Dienstaufsichtsbeschwerde) to the Regional Court (Landgericht) against VRiLG Groß
On 31 March 2025 I formally lodge a complaint seeking supervision of the performance of official duties (Dienstaufsichtsbeschwerde) against VRiLG Groß, presiding judge at the Berlin Regional Court (Landgericht Berlin), concerning systematic refusals to record supplements to the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision), ...
Open document →
Three opened letters from the BVerfG, the EGMR and my son
Three letters were received already opened, from the Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht), the EGMR (European Court of Human Rights) and my own son; documents relevant to the appeal on points of law (Revision) were missing in some of them.
Open document →
Complaint alleging a violation of the right to be heard through the Federal Court of Justice’s inactivity
On 26.03.2025, I lodged a complaint alleging a violation of the right to be heard (Anhörungsrüge) through the Federal Court of Justice’s inactivity in the proceedings on the appeal on points of law (Revision). Several written declarations under responsibility for their truthfulness (eidesstattliche Erklärungen) were enclosed.
Open document →
Application for a statement from the prison management (JVA-Leitung) concerning denial of access to mail
On 26 March 2025 at 6:25, I submitted a formal application to the management of Moabit correctional facility (JVA Moabit) for written information on
Open document →
Urgent complaint and request for assistance — human rights violations and systematic denial of legal protection in Berlin
Urgent complaint and request for assistance — human rights violations and systematic denial of legal protection in Berlin
Open document →
Complaint alleging a violation of the right to be heard (Anhörungsrüge) against the BGH (Federal Court of Justice) concerning the Federal Court of Justice’s inactivity in proceedings on an appeal on points of law
Complaint alleging a violation of the right to be heard (Anhörungsrüge) against the BGH (Federal Court of Justice) concerning the Federal Court of Justice’s inactivity in proceedings on an appeal on points of law
Open document →
Prevention of posting important documents relevant to the proceedings
On 25 March 2025 I was prevented at the prison (JVA) from sending an important letter involving a time limit through the mail office. The letter, which I passed to JVA staff open for inspection — überga...
Open document →
Refusal to accept my immediate complaint (sofortige Beschwerde) under § 311 StPO
On 24.03.2025 the court registry officer (Urkundsbeamtin) at Tiergarten Local Court (Amtsgericht Tiergarten), acting on a direct instruction from her superior, refused to accept my immediate complaint (sofortige Beschwerde) against a decision of the Berlin Higher Regional Court (Kammergericht Berlin) under...
Open document →
Complaint seeking supervision of the performance of official duties (Dienstaufsichtsbeschwerde) to the President of Amtsgericht Tiergarten Berlin (Tiergarten Local Court in Berlin) concerning systematic refusal to record submissions
Complaint seeking supervision of the performance of official duties (Dienstaufsichtsbeschwerde) to the President of Amtsgericht Tiergarten Berlin (Tiergarten Local Court in Berlin) concerning systematic refusal to record submissions
Open document →
Individual application to the EGMR (European Court of Human Rights) against the Federal Republic of Germany
Submission of the individual application under Article 34 EMRK (European Convention on Human Rights) to the European Court of Human Rights (EGMR) against the Federal Republic of Germany. The application concerns violations of my rights under the E...
Open document →
Receipt of mail at the BGH (Federal Court of Justice): original supplements — part 3, part 4 and coronavirus aid
According to the list of annexes, the supplements to the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision), Parts 3 and 4, and the “Coronavirus assistance” (Coronahilfe) supplement were documented on 18.03.2025 as annexes to the application to the BGH for an interim order.
Open document →
Refusal by the registry clerk to accept documents
On 18.03.2025, according to the list of annexes, the court registry officer (Urkundsbeamtin) at Tiergarten Local Court (AG Tiergarten) again refused to accept my supplement to the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision), a criminal complaint against VRiLG Groß and an application to the BGH wege...
Open document →
Refusal by the court registry officer to accept an immediate complaint (sofortige Beschwerde)
On 18.03.2025 at 08:45 the registry officer of Amtsgericht Tiergarten (Tiergarten Local Court), on direct instructions from her superior, refused to accept the following submissions from me:
Open document →
Submission of the constitutional complaint against the order of the Berlin Higher Regional Court (Kammergericht) of 21.02.2025 (Annex 34_F3).
Submission of the constitutional complaint against the order of the Berlin Higher Regional Court (Kammergericht) of 21.02.2025 (Annex 34_F3).
Open document →
Application for an interim order on account of systematic refusals
On 15.03.2025 I applied to the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) for an interim order to accept my supplements to the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision), Parts 3 and 4, and further complaint documents.
Open document →
Application to the BGH (Federal Court of Justice) for an interim order concerning systematic refusal to record submissions
Application to the BGH (Federal Court of Justice) for an interim order concerning systematic refusal to record submissions
Open document →
Refusal to accept further supplements
On 14.03.2025, according to the description of the annex, the court registry officer (Urkundsbeamtin) at JVA Moabit refused to accept a further supplement to the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision), referring to an allegedly expired time limit.
Open document →
Refusal by the court registry official at JVA Moabit (Urkundsbeamte) to accept a supplement to the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision)
Refusal by the court registry official at JVA Moabit (Urkundsbeamte) to accept a supplement to the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision)
Open document →
Reply from Kammergericht Berlin (Berlin Higher Regional Court)
On 13.03.2025 at 12:45 I received a letter without a prescribed form from the Criminal Division (Strafsenat) of the Berlin Higher Regional Court (Kammergericht Berlin) dated 10.03.2025. It informed me that my immediate complaint (sofortige Beschwerde) to the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) — weitergelei...
Open document →
Application made to the court registry officers at JVA Moabit (Moabit Prison)
At 6:25 I submitted a request to the registry officers (Urkundsbeamten) at JVA Moabit to send Part 3 of the supplement to the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision) to the BGH under §§334, 345 StPO. No reply received so far.
Open document →
Discontinuation of the investigation by the Berlin Amtsanwaltschaft (local prosecutor’s office)
The Berlin Public Prosecutor’s Office (Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin) discontinued proceedings 3024 Js 12009/24 under § 170 Abs. 2 StPO: a conviction based solely on the information provided by the complainant did not appear sufficiently likely. Die...
Open document →
Supplement to the grounds for the appeal on points of law (Revision), part 2, for the record
On 28.02.2025 Part 2 of the supplement to the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision) was entered in the record. This supplement too, in the list of annexes, as identical in content to the supplement originally drafted — besc...
Open document →
Submission of Part 2 of the supplement to the grounds for the appeal on points of law (Revision)
On 28.02.2025 I was finally able to lodge the second part of the supplement to the grounds of my appeal on points of law (Revision) by having it recorded by the court registry.
Open document →
Order of the Higher Regional Court (Kammergericht) on my complaint under § 304 StPO (Annex 30/F3)
I received an order from the Berlin Higher Regional Court (Kammergericht Berlin) in response to my complaint under § 304 StPO against the order of 08.01.2025 (Annex 30/F3), which I lodged on 16.01.2025. The response was as ...
Open document →
Renewed refusal to accept a submission for the record
On 24.02.2025, according to the documentation, acceptance of a complaint for the court registry’s record was again refused.
Open document →
Refusal by the court registry officer to accept an immediate complaint (sofortige Beschwerde)
On 24.02.2025 at 8:45, the registry officer of Amtsgericht Tiergarten (Tiergarten Local Court) refused to accept my complaint for recording by the court registry on direct instructions from her superior (Anlage 26_F2).
Open document →
Complaint against the refusal to accept jurisdiction
A complaint was lodged against the Kammergericht’s (Higher Regional Court’s) refusal to accept jurisdiction. It challenged the rejection without forwarding pursuant to § 17a Abs. 2 GVG.
Open document →
Immediate complaint (sofortige Beschwerde) against denial of jurisdiction
I lodged an immediate complaint (sofortige Beschwerde) against the rejection of my application by the Higher Regional Court (Kammergericht), which declared on 17.02.2025 that it lacked jurisdiction but did not make the forwarding required by law under § 17a Abs. 2 GV...
Open document →
Response from the Kammergericht (Higher Regional Court) concerning jurisdiction
On 20.02.2025, the Berlin Higher Regional Court (Kammergericht) responded to the application of 03.02.2025. According to the list of annexes, the judicial division (Senat) stated that, under the allocation-of-business plan, it did not have jurisdiction over such applications.
Open document →
Reply from the Berlin Higher Regional Court (Kammergericht Berlin) to the application of 03.02.2025 for an interim order at Kammergericht Berlin.
Reply from the Berlin Higher Regional Court (Kammergericht Berlin) to the application of 03.02.2025 for an interim order at Kammergericht Berlin. Quote: “According to the current allocation-of-business plan of Kammergericht, the Division for such applications nich...
Open document →
Reply from the Regional Court (Landgericht) to applications addressed to the BGH and Kammergericht
Two applications through the court registry officer (Urkundsbeamten), addressed to the BGH and the Higher Regional Court (Kammergericht), yet VRiLG Groß from the Regional Court (Landgericht) replied. It is unclear how he obtained access to these applications.
Open document →
Application to the Federal Court of Justice
On 17.02.2025 I made another application to the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof). It concerned inclusion of the supplement to the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision) of 20.01.2025, a declaration that the power of attorney had been withdrawn, lack of access to the case file un...
Open document →
Application submitted to Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court of Justice; BGH):
Inclusion in the proceedings of the supplement to the grounds of my appeal on points of law (Revision), since it was already lodged on 20 January 2025 under § 345 Abs. 2 StPO by being recorded by the court registry, but to this day there has been no Eingangsbest...
Open document →
Request for assistance submitted to the Bundesjustizministerium (Federal Ministry of Justice)
Urgent complaint to the Federal Ministry of Justice (Bundesjustizministerium) after submissions at state level remained unanswered: no acknowledgement of receipt of the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision), no response to the criminal complaint against Criminal Police Commissioner (Kriminalkommissar) Weiß.
Open document →
Constitutional complaint submitted to the Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court)
Constitutional complaint concerning systematic violations of fundamental rights by the Berlin Regional Court (Landgericht Berlin) and the Berlin Prosecutor General’s Office (Generalstaatsanwaltschaft Berlin).
Open document →
Letter to the Federal Court of Justice
On 13.02.2025 I asked the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) to acknowledge receipt of the supplement to the grounds of my appeal on points of law (Revision) of 20.01.2025 and to provide the file number. I also referred to the revocation of the power of attorney and the E...
Open document →
Letter to the Berlin Higher Regional Court (Kammergericht)
On 13.02.2025, I also sent a letter to the Berlin Higher Regional Court (Kammergericht) requesting acknowledgement of receipt of the application of 03.02.2025 and notification of the file reference assigned there.
Open document →
Submission to Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court of Justice; BGH)
I wrote a request for the record of the registry at the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof) for acknowledgement of receipt under § 37 StPO concerning my supplement to the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision) of 20.01.25 through the court registry officer (Urkundsbeamterin) — zum Prot...
Open document →
Submission to Kammergericht Berlin (Berlin Higher Regional Court)
I made a request for the record of the registry at the Berlin Higher Regional Court (Kammergericht Berlin) for acknowledgement of receipt under § 37 StPO of my application of 03.02.2025 for an interim classification (Einstweilige Einordnung) and Festst...
Open document →
Application to the Kammergericht (Higher Regional Court) for an interim order and a declaratory ruling
On 03.02.2025 I applied to the Berlin Higher Regional Court (Kammergericht Berlin) for an interim order and a declaration. It particularly concerned the forwarding and confirmation of letters concerning the appeal on points of law (Revision) and other complaints, and di...
Open document →
Application for an interim order and a declaratory finding to Kammergericht Berlin (Berlin Higher Regional Court)
Application for an interim order and a declaratory finding to Kammergericht Berlin (Berlin Higher Regional Court)
Open document →
Request for acknowledgement of receipt under § 37 StPO
On 30.01.2025 I requested acknowledgement of receipt of the supplement to the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision) of 20.01.2025 and of further complaints and objections concerning delay (Verzögerungsrügen).
Open document →
Request for acknowledgement of receipt
On 30.01.2025 I made an application to the court registry officer (Urkundsbeamtin) for acknowledgement of receipt under § 37 StPO of the following documents: the supplement lodged on 20.01.2025 to the Revisionsb...
Open document →
Supplement to the complaint
On 21.01.2025 I supplemented my complaint of 13.01.2025 and referred to the letter of 16.01.2025 from VRiLG Groß received without a prescribed form. I demanded an official judicial decision open to appeal — übe...
Open document →
I supplemented the complaint I had already lodged on 13.01.2025, insisted on its admissibility and referred to the ... without a prescribed form…
I supplemented the complaint I had already lodged on 13.01.2025, insisted on its admissibility and referred to the letter without a prescribed form from VRiLG Groß dated 16.01.2025. (Annex 32_F3)
Open document →
Supplement to the grounds for the appeal on points of law (Revision), part 1, for the record
On 20.01.2025 Part 1 of the supplement to the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision) was entered in the record. According to the list of annexes, it was identical in content to the supplement originally drafted and was recorded before the BGH-Besc...
Open document →
Submission of the supplement to the grounds for the appeal on points of law
On 20.01.2025 I was finally able to lodge the first part of the supplement to the grounds of my appeal on points of law (Revision) by having it recorded by the court registry. (For the annex see Fall 1 Revisionsbegründung Ergänzung Teil 1 (UKB)_20.01.2025).
Open document →
Partial delivery of the supplement to the grounds for the appeal on points of law
On 17.01.2025 the court registry officer (Urkundsbeamte) began accepting the supplement to the grounds of my appeal on points of law (Revision) for the registry record, but in a greatly reduced form and with many deficiencies.
Open document →
Groß refuses access to the case file despite an application to discharge counsel from the appointment
VRiLG Groß refuses access to the case file by referring to ongoing representation by defence counsel, although an application to discharge the lawyer from the appointment had already been made.
Open document →
I sought a legal remedy in the form of a complaint under
§304 StPO against the above-mentioned order of 08.01.2025. (Annex 30_F3).
Open document →
VRiLG Groß: “There can therefore be no question of inaction” (Annex 31_F3)
I received a letter without a prescribed form from VRiLG Groß in which, despite § 306 StPO, he addressed, among other things, the complaint of 13.01.2025 about his own judicial inaction. Quote: “Of inaction ka...
Open document →
Refusal to accept a supplement to the appeal on points of law (Revision) for the record
On 15.01.2025, according to my written declaration under responsibility for its truthfulness (eidesstattliche Erklärung), the court registry officer (Urkundsbeamtin) at Tiergarten Local Court (Amtsgericht Tiergarten), acting under instructions, refused to accept my supplement to the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision) for the record.
Open document →
Request for an urgent appointment with the court registry officer at JVA Moabit
On 15.01.2025 I requested from the registry officer (Urkundsbeamte) at JVA Moabit an urgent appointment with a registry officer so that I could lodge my supplement to the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision) by having it recorded by the court registry under §345 StPO.
Open document →
Refusal by the court registry officer to accept a supplement to the grounds for the appeal on points of law
On 15.01.2025 at 9:15 the court registry officer (Urkundsbeamtin) at Tiergarten Local Court (Amtsgericht Tiergarten), acting on direct instructions from Ms Lukas and VRiLG Groß, refused to accept my supplement to the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision) for the record (An...
Open document →
Announcement of measures
On 15.01.2025 and again on 16.01.2025 I announced to the management of the prison section and the court registry officer (Urkundsbeamten) that I would lodge a criminal complaint and a complaint seeking supervision of the performance of official duties (Dienstaufsichtsbeschwerde), involve the media and gegebenenfa...
Open document →
On 15.01.2025 at 11:55 I received the order of 08.01.2025 in response to my application for a judicial decision of 09.09.2024.
On 15.01.2025 at 11:55 I received the order of 08.01.2025 in response to my application for a judicial decision of 09.09.2024. The order read: “The application for a judicial decision as...
Open document →
Reply without a prescribed form from VRiLG Groß dated 09.01.2025
On 14.01.2025 I received a reply without a prescribed form from VRiLG Groß dated 09.01.2025. According to the list of annexes, he stated that he had asked my defence counsel to provide a statement.
Open document →
Groß claims that defence counsel’s statement is missing
VRiLG Groß states that defence counsel’s statement is still outstanding, whereas the BGH order of the same day shows that it had already been available for a week.
Open document →
Complaint concerning judicial inactivity
On 13.01.2025 I lodged a complaint about judicial inaction. It concerned the applications of 10.12.2024, 11.12.2024 and 17.12.2024 that had not yet been decided and sought, in particular, discharge from the appointment of the V...
Open document →
Complaint about inaction
On 13.01.2025 I lodged a complaint about judicial inaction under §198 GVG. I referred to the applications of 10.12.2024, 11.12.2024 and 17.12.2024 that had not yet been decided and asked meinen...
Open document →
I lodge a complaint about judicial inaction under §198 GVG because the applications and statements referred to above (of…
I lodge a complaint about judicial inaction under §198 GVG because the applications and statements referred to above (of 09.09.2024;11.11.2024; 15.11.2024;26.11.2024; 10.12.2024) have not been answered — si...
Open document →
Enquiry about the state of the proceedings
On 06.01.2025, I enquired about the status of the application of 17.12.2024 to discharge defence counsel, which had not yet been decided.
Open document →
Status enquiry to Landgericht Berlin (Berlin Regional Court) (through UKB)
On 06.01.2025 I made a status enquiry concerning my application of 17.12.2024 (Anlage 7_F2).
Open document →
Acknowledgement of receipt of the application to discharge defence counsel
On 27.12.2024, I received an acknowledgement of receipt of my application of 17.12.2024.
Open document →
Acknowledgement of receipt of the application
On 27.12.2024 I received an acknowledgement of receipt of my application of 17.12.2024 (Anlage 6_F2).
Open document →
140 days after I submitted my application, Rabbi Segal from the Jewish community Schabbat-Berlin visited me for the first time.
140 days after I submitted my application, Rabbi Segal from the Jewish community Schabbat-Berlin visited me for the first time.
Open document →
Application to discharge court-appointed defence counsel
On 17.12.2024, I applied for lawyer Römer to be discharged as court-appointed defence counsel. The application later became the central subject of the order of the presiding judge of the 5th Criminal Division (Strafsenat) of the Federal Court of Justice of 07.05.2025.
Open document →
Application to discharge my lawyer from his duties as defence counsel, recorded by the court registry
On 17.12.2024 I applied for my lawyer to be discharged from his duties as defence counsel because of the breach of trust (Anlage 5_F2)
Open document →
Termination of the retainer and revocation of the power of attorney
On 16.12.2024 I terminated counsel RA Römer’s mandate and revoked the power of attorney. The reason was what I considered a serious breach of trust in connection with the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision) and the lack of contact.
Open document →
Termination of the lawyer’s mandate
On 16.12.2024 I terminated my lawyer’s mandate and revoked his power of attorney because of a serious breach of trust (Anlage 4_F2).
Open document →
I submit to Judge Gross at the Regional Court (Landgericht) a statement on the judicial decision provided (of 09.09.2024;11.11.2024; 15.11.2024;26.11.2024; 10.12.2024).
I submit to Judge Groß at the Regional Court (Landgericht) a statement on the judicial decision provided (of 09.09.2024;11.11.2024; 15.11.2024;26.11.2024; 10.12.2024). Statements of 24.10.2024; 03.12...
Open document →
Reply without a prescribed form from VRiLG Groß
On 12.12.2024 VRiLG Groß replied without a prescribed form to the application of 10.12.2024. According to the list of annexes, it was stated that access to the case file was no longer possible because the files had left the court; at the same time w...
Open document →
Groß: access to the case file impossible; time limit for the appeal on points of law (Revision) expired
VRiLG Groß states that access to the case file is impossible because the files had, according to him, left the court and refers to the expired time limit for submitting grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision).
Open document →
Supplement to the application of 10.12.2024
On 11.12.2024 I supplemented the application of 10.12.2024 to the Berlin Regional Court (Landgericht Berlin). The supplement served to clarify and pursue my request for access to the case file and an effective opportunity to supplement ...
Open document →
I write a supplement to the LG (Regional Court) concerning the above-mentioned
application for a court decision of 10.12.24. (Anlage 2_F2)
Open document →
Application for a judicial decision and access to the case file
On 10.12.2024 I applied for a judicial decision concerning extension of the time limit and/or the opportunity to supplement the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision) and requested access to the case file. The background was that contact with...
Open document →
Application for a deadline extension and access to the case file
On 10.12.2024 I applied for a judicial decision extending the time limit for supplementing the grounds of the appeal on points of law (Revision) and requested access to the case file because contact with my defence counsel for months had been unmögli...
Open document →
Application for a judicial decision: delivery of the rejecting decision of Senior Public Prosecutor (OStA) Wachs
I applied for a judicial decision concerning the letter of 04.12.2024 so that the rejecting decision of Senior Public Prosecutor (OStA) Wachs of 30.08.2024 would be handed over to me, and unlawfulness and repeated violations of fundamental rights — fes...
Open document →
Receipt of the grounds for the appeal on points of law (Revision) and identification of missing arguments
On 06.12.2024, according to my account, I first received the grounds of appeal on points of law (Revisionsbegründung) prepared by court-appointed counsel. Only then did it become apparent that substantial arguments of my own, procedural objections and evidential aspects were not, or not ausr...
Open document →
Receipt of the grounds for the appeal on points of law
On 06.12.2024 I finally received a copy of the grounds of appeal on points of law from my lawyer by post. On reviewing them, however, I found that substantial arguments crucial to the appeal were missing, ...
Open document →
I receive a response from the Moabit prison administration (AL) to my application of 18.11.2024 concerning the handing over of the decision refusing permission by Senior Public Prosecutor (OStA) Wachs of…
I receive a response from the Moabit prison administration (AL) to my application of 18.11.2024 concerning the handing over of the decision of 30.08.2024 by Senior Public Prosecutor (OStA) Wachs refusing permission to call the Jewish community’s telephone number ...
Open document →
I send a written submission to the Berlin Regional Court (LG Berlin) in response to Judge Groß’s letter of 25.11.2024.
I send a written submission to the Berlin Regional Court (LG Berlin) in response to Judge Groß’s letter of 25.11.2024. I expressly ask that the judge be stopped from attempting, in relation to the application for a judicial decision (AagE) already filed, “without a formal procedure wegzul...
Open document →
The representative of the Moabit prison administration (AL) informs me that the oral prohibition on handing over the decision of Senior Public Prosecutor (OStA) Wachs (30.08.2024) is treated as an official…
The representative of the Moabit prison administration (AL) informs me that the oral prohibition on handing over the decision of Senior Public Prosecutor (OStA) Wachs (30.08.2024) is treated as an official response to my application (18.11.2024) for the handing over of the schrift...
Open document →
Statement of grounds for the appeal on points of law (Revision) submitted by court-appointed defence counsel Römer
On 28.11.2024 the remaining court-appointed defence lawyer, Römer, filed the grounds of appeal on points of law. In the list of annexes these grounds of appeal are, as standardised and very brief grounds from court-appointed counsel, besc...
Open document →
Deadline for submitting grounds for the appeal on points of law
28.11.2024 was the last day on which the grounds of appeal on points of law should have been filed with the Regional Court. At that point I did not know whether my remaining defence lawyer had actually filed them...
Open document →
Urgent request for grounds for the appeal on points of law
After telephone calls were enabled, I immediately put strong pressure on my lawyer to obtain at least a copy of the grounds of appeal on points of law. But his response even to this urgent attempt was n...
Open document →
At 16 o’clock calls to the number 030/21280830 are finally enabled, so I call off the planned above-mentioned.
At 16 h, calls to the number 030/21280830 are finally enabled, so I call off the planned hunger strike mentioned above.
Open document →
I filed an application for a judicial decision (AagE) to enable spoken contact with the Jewish community and thereby fulfil my application to the prison administration (AL) of 5.11.2024 and…
I submitted an application for a judicial decision (AagE) to enable oral contact with the Jewish community and thereby give effect to my application to the facility management (AL) of 5.11.2024, and for a finding that the inactivity of the Moabit facility management (AL) was unlawful.
Open document →
Police investigation concerning threats and insult
On 16.09.2024 the Berlin police sent a witness questionnaire. Bagrash replied on 23.09.2024 and identified possible witnesses and video recordings (a fax transmission report is available). On 24.09.2024 the police requested a...
Open document →
I receive an order from the Berlin Regional Court (LG Berlin) lifting my restrictions under
§119 StPO (this has nothing to do with establishing contact with the Jewish community). Along with the above-mentioned order, also a letter stating that Judge Groß “intends” all applications for a judicial decision (AagE) already filed “without formal procedure aside ...
Open document →
I supplement my applications for a judicial decision (AagE) of 15.11.2024 with a detailed explanation of the legal position and my legitimate interests in a finding of…
I supplement my application for a judicial decision (AagE) of 15.11.2024 with a detailed explanation of the legal position and my legitimate interests in obtaining a finding of unlawfulness (Annex 14_F3).
Open document →
I ask the President of the Berlin Regional Court (LG Berlin) for permission to submit a service-supervision complaint (Dienstaufsichtsbeschwerde) against Judge Groß in Russian with…
I apply to the President of the Berlin Regional Court (LG Berlin) for permission to submit a complaint under service supervision (Dienstaufsichtsbeschwerde) against Judge Groß in Russian, with a brief explanation of the facts. (Annex 15, 2 pages_F3)
Open document →
I submit an application to the prison administration (AL), again requesting that the written refusal decision of Senior Public Prosecutor (OSta) Wachs of 30.08.2024 be handed over…
I submit an application to the facility management (AL), repeating my request to be handed the written refusal decision of Senior Public Prosecutor Wachs (OSta) of 30.08.2024 (Annex 16_F3).
Open document →
I ask the General Public Prosecutor for information about the legal procedure for filing criminal complaints against Judge Gross and Senior Public Prosecutor (OSta) Wachs for…
I ask the General Public Prosecutor for information about the legal procedure for filing criminal complaints against Judge Groß and Senior Public Prosecutor (OSta) Wachs for, among other things, perversion of justice (Rechtsbeugung), with a brief explanation of the Sachver...
Open document →
Application for a judicial decision: permission to call the telephone numbers
A renewed request for permission to call the Jewish community’s telephone numbers and to enable written correspondence, with an application for a finding that the refusal was unlawful.
Open document →
Under observation by the State Criminal Police Office (LKA), I manage to communicate the start of my hunger strike (02.12.2024) in protest against the suppression of my contact with the…
Under observation by the State Criminal Police Office (LKA), I manage to communicate the start of my hunger strike (02.12.2024) in protest against the suppression of my contact with the Jewish community during a 20-minute Skype call with my wife ...
Open document →
Letter to the Jewish community Chabad Berlin on the legal position concerning postal correspondence
I send a letter to the Jewish community Chabad Berlin referring to the legal position concerning postal correspondence with a religious community. At 6:20 I handed in the letter and at 12:15 zur...
Open document →
I receive a written reply to my application of 31.10.2024
Senior Public Prosecutor (OStA) Wachs had already refused permission to call on 30.08.2024 (Annex 11_F3).
Open document →
I receive written acknowledgement of receipt of my application for a judicial decision (AagE) of 11.11.2024 (Annex 10_F3).
I receive written acknowledgement of receipt of my application for a judicial decision (AagE) of 11.11.2024 (Annex 10_F3).
Open document →
Application for a judicial decision: restrictions and religious contact
Two applications at the same time: lifting the restrictions under § 119 StPO and — independently of this — a renewed objection to the refusal to enable contact with the Jewish community.
Open document →
I write to the Regional Court to enquire about the status of the application for a judicial decision (AagE) of 09.09.24 (Annex 8_F3).
I write to the Regional Court to enquire about the status of the application for a judicial decision (AagE) of 09.09.24 (Annex 8_F3).
Open document →
I submitted an application to the prison administration (AL) for permission to call two telephone numbers, 030/8802180 and 030/2844560 (Jewish community and Central Council of Jews), with…
I submitted an application to the facility management (AL) to enable calls to two telephone numbers, 030/8802180 and 030/2844560 (Jewish community and Central Council of Jews), referring to the legal position (Annex 7_F3).
Open document →
I submitted an application/complaint under service supervision (Dienstaufsichtsbeschwerde) to the facility management (AL) to enable calls to the above-mentioned
telephone numbers, with an explanation of the unconstitutionality, and submit a complaint over the refusal to provide a workplace (Annex 6, 3 pages_F3).
Open document →
I submit another application to the facility management to enable calls to the above-mentioned
telephone number, with a detailed explanation of the legal position and a reference to the violation of my fundamental right (Annex 5_F3).
Open document →
Service of the judgment in the appeal-on-points-of-law procedure (Revision)
The order of the presiding judge of the Federal Court of Justice’s (Bundesgerichtshof) 5th Criminal Division of 07.05.2025 records that, following service on 28.10.2024, the judgment continued to be dealt with in the proceedings on appeal on points of law and the remaining Pflichtver...
Open document →
I submit an application to the administration (hereafter AL) of Moabit Prison (JVA Moabit) for permission to call the telephone number 030/21280830 (Jewish community)…
I submit an application to the management (hereafter AL) of JVA Moabit correctional facility to enable calls to the telephone number 030/21280830 (Jewish community), enclosing an explanation of the legal position (Annex 4_F3).
Open document →
I prepare a statement in response to the letter of 17.10.2024 from Groß, presiding judge at the Regional Court (VRILG).
I prepare a statement in response to the letter of 17.10.2024 from Groß, presiding judge at the Regional Court (VRILG).
Open document →
Letter from Judge Groß without a prescribed form concerning the application of 09.09.2024
Judge Groß attempts to dispose of the application of 09.09.2024 informally instead of formally deciding on the refusal of telephone contact with Rabbi Segal.
Open document →
Discharge of my lawyers
On 12.09.2024 I received Judge Groß’s order releasing two of my lawyers, Mumm and Jochmann, from their appointments as defence counsel. (Literally after the above-mentioned visit by Prof. Dr. Andreas Heinemann-Grüder.) There remained...
Open document →
I submitted an application to the pastoral care service and the social service to participate in Jewish worship or have a direct meeting with a…
I submitted an application to the chaplaincy service and social service to participate in a Jewish religious service or to meet a rabbi in person.
Open document →
Application for a judicial decision (AagE) concerning refused contact with a rabbi
Two applications: permission for telephone contact with Rabbi Segal, and a finding that Senior Public Prosecutor (OStA) Wachs’s failure to communicate the refusal decision was unlawful.
Open document →
The above-mentioned social worker at JVA Moabit correctional facility, Ms
Gaedke informs me of the repeated prohibition on handing over the contact details, with a written refusal from Senior Public Prosecutor (OStA) Wachs.
Open document →
I receive an oral refusal from Senior Public Prosecutor Wachs (OStA)
Notification by the social worker at Moabit Prison (JVA Moabit), Ms Gaedke, together with the prohibition on handing it over and the above-mentioned decision issued by Senior Public Prosecutor (OStA) Wachs.
Open document →
I submit an application to the Berlin General Public Prosecutor’s Office (hereafter GSdA) for permission to call the telephone number 030/21280830 of the Jewish…
I submit an application to the Berlin Prosecutor General’s Office (hereafter GSdA) to enable calls to the telephone number 030/21280830 of the Jewish community Chabad Berlin (Annex 20_F3).
Open document →
Criminal complaint against Pavlo S.
A criminal complaint was recorded. The form is mistakenly dated 05.02.2019 but describes the incident of 22.07.2024 — the exact date on which it was recorded still needs to be clarified from the receipt stamp.
Open document →
Acceptance/receipt of the first-instance judgment
According to the list of annexes to the constitutional complaints, the judgment of the Berlin Regional Court of 22.07.2024 is recorded as accepted or served with the date 24.07.2024. It thus became the central point of reference d...
Open document →
Judgment of the Berlin Regional Court I in criminal case 522 Ks 5/23
On 22.07.2024 the Berlin I Regional Court — 22nd Large Criminal Chamber / Schwurgericht — pronounced judgment against Dmitry Bagrash in proceedings (522 Ks) 176 Js 4/22 (5/23). The operative part provided for conviction for versu...
Read the judgment — with commentary →
Public accusations and a call for violence on the day the judgment was pronounced
On the morning of the day judgment was pronounced, Pavlo S. is alleged to have spread false information among other prisoners about the grounds for Bagrash’s detention and called for violence against him. On the same day the judgment (5 years 4 months) was v...
Open document →
Cell visit on the eve of the pronouncement of judgment
According to Bagrash’s account, Pavlo S. visited his cell on the day before judgment was pronounced. Bagrash assumed the conversation was being monitored and spoke about his case and planned political steps n...
Open document →
Contact with fellow prisoner Pavlo S.
During exercise in the yard Bagrash met fellow prisoner Pavlo S., helped him with translations and letters and let him russis...
Open document →
Isolation at JVA Moabit correctional facility after the arrest
According to his own account, after his arrest in December 2022 Dmitry Bagrash was completely isolated for around thirteen months. Only after the court lifted this isolation could he together with other Gefange...
Open document →