Dmitry Bagrash · Home
Case 2 · Criminal complaint against Groß / Wachs

Prosecutor General’s response · Strafanzeige Groß/Wachs

I received the letter from the Prosecutor General’s Office dated 29 September 2026 in prison and read it aloud twice over the telephone. Anlage 224_F2 is the transcription made in this way, not a scan. The scan of the original will be added and will then take precedence.

Recorded details

Reference
163 AR 392/26
Subject
Submissions of 2 and 29 September 2026
Received by me
7 October 2026, 17:20

The whole letter

Sehr geehrter Herr Bagrash,
Ihre Eingabe vom 2. September 2026 habe ich zuständigkeitshalber der Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin zur weiteren Bearbeitung zugeleitet, der ich Ihre Eingabe vom 29. September 2026 ebenfalls übermittle.
Ein Aktenzeichen der Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin ist hier noch nicht bekannt.
Hochachtungsvoll

Translation: “Dear Mr Bagrash, for reasons of jurisdiction I have forwarded your submission of 2 September 2026 to the Berlin Public Prosecutor’s Office for further processing, to which I am also transmitting your submission of 29 September 2026. A case number of the Berlin Public Prosecutor’s Office is not yet known here. Yours faithfully”

What it says — and what it does not

Why the referral does not answer the question

Senior prosecutor Wachs prosecuted me as an official of the Berlin Prosecutor General’s Office. The Berlin Public Prosecutor’s Office, to which the complaint was sent, is under the supervision and direction of the Prosecutor General’s Office (§ 147 no. 3 GVG); its officials must follow its instructions (§ 146 GVG). The complaint against a prosecutor of the Prosecutor General’s Office therefore lies with an authority to which the Prosecutor General’s Office can give instructions.

These are exactly the questions I ask in follow-up letters 226 and 227_F2: Submissions and status →

Original / source document (DE)

Anlage 224_F2

Terms